Is a transverse lie in labor with 2 cm effacement an indication for cesarean section (CS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 5, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

A transverse lie labor at 2 cm effaced is a strong indication for cesarean section (CS) due to the high risk of complications and the impossibility of vaginal delivery in this presentation. In a transverse lie, the baby is positioned horizontally across the birth canal, making it impossible for the head or buttocks to enter the pelvis and progress through labor 1. According to the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, if cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) cannot be ruled out, CS is a more prudent and safer choice to avoid risks of damage to the mother and fetus 1.

Key considerations in this scenario include:

  • The impossibility of vaginal delivery with a transverse lie presentation
  • The risks associated with attempting vaginal delivery, including umbilical cord prolapse, uterine rupture, birth trauma, and fetal distress
  • The importance of thorough cephalopelvimetric assessment to exclude CPD before considering any intervention other than CS
  • The standard of care in obstetric practice, which is to proceed with CS in cases of transverse lie presentation with cervical changes, as it ensures the safety of both mother and baby 1.

In the context of real-life clinical medicine, prioritizing the safety of both mother and baby is paramount, and the potential risks associated with attempting vaginal delivery in a transverse lie presentation far outweigh any potential benefits, making CS the recommended course of action 1.

From the Research

Transverse Lie Labor and Cesarean Section Indication

  • The provided studies do not directly address whether a transverse lie labor with 2 cm effacement is an indication for cesarean section (CS) 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • However, the studies suggest that external cephalic version (ECV) can be a viable option to reduce the need for CS in cases of transverse lie or breech presentation 2, 3, 4, 5.
  • One study found that ECV was successful in 65% of cases, with a reversion rate of 5%, and no maternal or fetal complications related to the procedure 5.
  • Another study reported a 50% reduction in CS rate with the use of external version in laboring patients with transverse lie presentation 2.
  • The decision to perform a CS in cases of transverse lie labor may depend on various factors, including the progression of labor, fetal well-being, and the presence of any complications 6.
  • The "intra-abdominal version technique" has been described as a method to facilitate delivery of transverse lie by low-segment CS, avoiding the need for a classic CS 6.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

External cephalic version after previous cesarean section.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1991

Research

External cephalic version.

American family physician, 1998

Research

External cephalic version: first report from Thailand.

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet, 1999

Related Questions

What is the timing of urgent cesarean section (C-section) after external cephalic version (ECV)?
Can a fetus with transverse lie and shoulder presentation at 28 weeks gestation have a vaginal delivery?
What are the complications of breech (footling or frank) presentation during vaginal delivery?
What is the step-by-step procedure for a low transverse cesarean section, including surgical tools and medications such as cefazolin (antibiotic) and acetaminophen (pain management)?
What are the recommended approaches for managing a breech presentation in pregnancy?
How should the dosing of combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills be adjusted in a patient experiencing daily breakthrough bleeding since initiation 3 months ago?
What are the symptoms of hypobilia (low bile)?
What is the cause of a recurrent, pruritic (itchy) rash with small bumps on the ring finger, previously treated with a topical ointment (Rx), which temporarily subsides with application of emollients like Aquaphor (petrolatum)?
What is the likely diagnosis for a 71-year-old male with asthma, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension presenting with worsening nasal and chest congestion, wheezing, and productive cough, using Mucinex (guaiifenisen) for symptomatic relief?
What are the contraindications for Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) therapy, according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines?
Why is combination therapy with Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors not recommended?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.