What targets are recommended for depth of anesthesia monitoring during intraoperative anesthesia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For intraoperative anesthesia, the recommended target range for processed EEG monitoring, such as Bispectral Index (BIS) or similar indices, is typically between 40-60, as this range is associated with a low risk of awareness and optimal anesthesia depth. This recommendation is based on the most recent guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists, which suggest that processed EEG monitoring can aid in adjusting the dose of anesthetic drug and reduce the incidence of adverse effects, including accidental awareness during general anesthesia (AAGA) 1. The use of processed EEG monitoring, such as BIS, has been shown to reduce the risk of AAGA, improve early recovery times, and reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction 1.

When using processed EEG monitoring, it is essential to develop a basic understanding of EEG waveforms and the interpretation of information from power spectral analysis, rather than relying solely on index values displayed by the monitors 1. The monitoring should start before induction and continue at least until full recovery from the effects of the neuromuscular blockade drug has been confirmed 1.

Key considerations for processed EEG monitoring include:

  • Starting monitoring before induction of anesthesia
  • Continuing monitoring until full recovery from neuromuscular blockade
  • Adjusting anesthetic dose based on individual patient factors, such as age and comorbidities
  • Using processed EEG monitoring as part of a comprehensive approach to anesthesia monitoring, including clinical signs and hemodynamic parameters 1.

By following these guidelines and using processed EEG monitoring effectively, anesthetists can optimize anesthesia depth and reduce the risk of adverse effects, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

From the Research

Targets for Depth of Anaesthesia Monitoring

The targets for depth of anaesthesia monitoring are not strictly defined, but several studies provide guidance on the recommended ranges.

  • A study published in 2019 2 found that BIS target values differed between studies, but all were within a range of values between 40 to 60.
  • Another study from 2001 3 observed that the BIS scores of responders to voice were significantly different from nonresponders, with a mean BIS score of 86 +/- 10 for responders and 74 +/- 14 for nonresponders.
  • A 2011 study 4 noted that deep anesthesia (BIS < 45) during the intraoperative period is associated with increased postoperative mortality.

Factors Affecting Depth of Anaesthesia Monitoring

Several factors can affect the accuracy of depth of anaesthesia monitoring, including:

  • The use of neuromuscular blocking agents, which can affect the readings of brain function monitors 5
  • The type of anaesthetic agent used, which can influence the relationship between BIS scores and sedation depth 3
  • Inter-individual variability in BIS scores, which can make it difficult to predict sedation depth 6, 3

Recommendations for Practice

Based on the available evidence, it is recommended that:

  • BIS-guided anaesthesia be used to reduce the risk of intraoperative awareness and improve early recovery times 2
  • Anaesthetic management be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account factors such as comorbidities and the type of anaesthetic agent used 4, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.