Is Macrobid (Nitrofurantoin) or Bactrim (Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole) more suitable for patients with Impaired renal function (low eGFR)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For patients with low eGFR, Bactrim (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) is generally the better choice compared to Macrobid (nitrofurantoin) due to its broader coverage and lower risk of toxicity in renal impairment. When treating urinary tract infections in patients with reduced kidney function, Bactrim dosing should be reduced based on creatinine clearance - typically 50% dose reduction when eGFR is 15-30 ml/min and avoiding use when eGFR is below 15 ml/min 1. Macrobid is contraindicated in severe kidney impairment (eGFR <30 ml/min) because the drug doesn't achieve adequate urinary concentrations and may accumulate to toxic levels, potentially causing peripheral neuropathy 1.

Some key points to consider when choosing between Macrobid and Bactrim for patients with low eGFR include:

  • The risk of toxicity and side effects associated with each medication
  • The severity of the patient's kidney impairment
  • The presence of any other underlying medical conditions that may affect the choice of medication
  • The local resistance patterns of common urinary pathogens

According to the most recent and highest quality study, Bactrim is often the better choice for patients with low eGFR due to its broader coverage and lower risk of toxicity 1. However, for patients with only mildly reduced kidney function (eGFR 45-60 ml/min), Macrobid may still be appropriate at standard dosing of 100 mg twice daily for 5-7 days 1. Always monitor kidney function closely during treatment with either medication, and watch for signs of adverse effects including rash, GI disturbances, or worsening kidney function 1.

From the FDA Drug Label

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim is rapidly absorbed following oral administration. ... However, patients with severely impaired renal function exhibit an increase in the half-lives of both components, requiring dosage regimen adjustment (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATIONsection).

PRECAUTIONS ... Avoid use of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim in patients with impaired renal or hepatic function...

Low eGFR Considerations

  • Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim: require dosage regimen adjustment in patients with severely impaired renal function 2
  • Macrobid (nitrofurantoin): not discussed in the provided drug labels
  • Bactrim (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole): should be avoided in patients with impaired renal function 2

Clinical Decision Based on the available information, Bactrim (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) may not be the best option for patients with low eGFR due to the increased risk of adverse effects and the need for dosage adjustment. However, without direct information on Macrobid, no conclusion can be drawn about its safety in patients with low eGFR.

From the Research

Comparison of Macrobid and Bactrim for Low eGFR

  • Macrobid (nitrofurantoin) and Bactrim (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) are both used to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs), but their effectiveness can be influenced by the patient's renal function, specifically the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
  • Studies have shown that nitrofurantoin may not be as effective in patients with low eGFR, as its urine concentration may be subtherapeutic 4, 5, 7.
  • However, one study found that nitrofurantoin was still effective in treating UTIs in patients with renal insufficiency (CrCl < 60 ml/min), with a cure rate of 69% 7.
  • Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, on the other hand, has been shown to be effective in treating UTIs, but its use may be limited by resistance patterns 3, 6.
  • A study comparing the effectiveness of nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and trimethoprim for the treatment of cystitis found that nitrofurantoin was associated with more clinical failures than fosfomycin in patients with eGFR < 60 mL/min 5.
  • Another study found that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower rate of treatment failure than nitrofurantoin in women with relatively low eGFR 4.

Considerations for Patients with Low eGFR

  • Patients with low eGFR may require alternative treatment options, such as fosfomycin or other antibiotics that are not affected by renal function 3, 5.
  • The choice of antibiotic should be based on the patient's specific needs and the susceptibility patterns of the uropathogen 3, 6.
  • It is essential to consider the patient's renal function when selecting an antibiotic for the treatment of UTIs, and to monitor their response to treatment closely 4, 5, 7.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Kidney function and the use of nitrofurantoin to treat urinary tract infections in older women.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2015

Research

The effectiveness of nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin and trimethoprim for the treatment of cystitis in relation to renal function.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2020

Research

Nitrofurantoin safety and effectiveness in treating acute uncomplicated cystitis (AUC) in hospitalized adults with renal insufficiency: antibiotic stewardship implications.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.