What are the complications of femoral (percutaneous arterial access in the femoral artery) approach coronary catheterization (coronary angiography)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Complications of femoral approach coronary catheterization can be minimized by using radial artery access, which is recommended to reduce bleeding and vascular complications, as well as mortality rate, especially in patients with acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease 1.

Common Complications

The most common complications of femoral approach coronary catheterization include:

  • Access site related complications, such as hematoma formation, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and femoral artery thrombosis or dissection
  • Non-vascular complications, including contrast-induced nephropathy, allergic reactions to contrast, stroke, myocardial infarction, arrhythmias, and rarely death

Risk Factors

Risk factors for complications include:

  • Advanced age
  • Female gender
  • Low body weight
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Anticoagulation therapy
  • Operator inexperience

Prevention Strategies

Prevention strategies include:

  • Proper patient selection
  • Careful technique during arterial puncture
  • Appropriate sheath size selection
  • Meticulous post-procedure care
  • Manual compression for 15-20 minutes after sheath removal or vascular closure devices to reduce bleeding complications
  • Post-procedure monitoring, including frequent vital sign checks and access site examination for at least 6 hours
  • Advising patients to limit activity for 24 hours and avoid heavy lifting for 5-7 days to prevent late bleeding complications, as supported by studies such as 1 and 1.

Key Considerations

It is essential to note that the use of radial artery access can significantly reduce the risk of complications, as stated in the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization 1. Therefore, radial artery access is the preferred approach for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, especially those with acute coronary syndromes or stable ischemic heart disease.

From the Research

Complications of Femoral Approach Coronary Catheterization

  • The femoral approach for coronary catheterization is associated with various complications, including hematomas, active bleeding, and retroperitoneal bleeding 2, 3.
  • The use of antithrombotic agents, such as antiplatelet and anticoagulants, increases the risk of complications 2.
  • The location of the femoral arteriotomy site is a predictor of life-threatening complications, with arteriotomy above the most inferior border of the inferior epigastric artery increasing the risk of retroperitoneal bleeding 3.
  • Vascular closure devices can reduce the incidence of femoral artery complications, but their use may not be warranted in low-risk patients or those with previous ipsilateral catheterization 2.

Comparison with Radial Approach

  • The radial approach for coronary catheterization is associated with a lower risk of complications, including major bleeding and vascular complications, compared to the femoral approach 4, 5, 6.
  • The radial approach reduces the risk of death, major bleeding, and vascular complications, but increases the risk of procedural failure 6.
  • The benefits of radial access are consistent regardless of clinical characteristics or whether coronary angiography is performed with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 5.

Risk Factors

  • Older age is a risk factor for vascular complications 3.
  • Coronary artery disease is associated with an increased risk of complications 2.
  • The use of closure devices, male gender, and prior catheterization are protective factors against complications 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Angiographic predictors of femoral access site complications: implication for planned percutaneous coronary intervention.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2005

Research

Comparison of safety of radial and femoral approaches for coronary catheterization in interventional cardiology.

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2015

Research

Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2021

Research

Influence of radial versus femoral access site on coronary angiography and intervention outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.