What diagnostic tests should be performed on ascitic (ascites) fluid?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

When evaluating ascites fluid, you should perform a diagnostic paracentesis with several key tests, prioritizing cell count with differential, albumin measurement to calculate serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG), and culture with sensitivity, as these are crucial for differentiating between portal hypertension, malignancy, infection, and other causes of ascites, as recommended by the most recent guidelines 1. The initial step in evaluating ascites fluid involves a gross examination, followed by key laboratory tests. These tests should include:

  • Cell count with differential to assess for signs of infection or malignancy
  • Albumin measurement to calculate the SAAG, which helps differentiate between portal hypertension and other causes of ascites
  • Total protein and glucose levels to further characterize the ascites fluid
  • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) to help differentiate between spontaneous and secondary bacterial peritonitis
  • Culture with sensitivity to identify any infectious organisms and guide antibiotic therapy Additional tests may be considered based on clinical suspicion, such as:
  • Cytology for malignant cells if malignancy is suspected
  • Gram stain and pH measurement to further evaluate for infection
  • Neutrophil count and bacterial cultures if spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is suspected
  • Adenosine deaminase testing and acid-fast bacilli staining if tuberculosis is a concern
  • Amylase and triglyceride levels to identify pancreatic ascites or chylous ascites, respectively The SAAG is a critical test, as values ≥1.1 g/dL suggest portal hypertension, while values <1.1 g/dL point to other etiologies like malignancy or infection 1. It's also important to note that the use of reagent strips for rapid diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is not recommended due to low sensitivity and high risk of false negative results 1. Prompt and accurate testing allows for appropriate diagnosis and treatment initiation, which is crucial for improving patient outcomes in terms of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life.

From the Research

Ascites Fluid Analysis

To determine the cause of ascites, several tests can be run on the ascites fluid. The following are some of the key tests:

  • Cell count and differential, including polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN), lymphocytes, eosinophils, and macrophages 2, 3
  • Serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) to classify the cause of ascites into portal hypertension-related and non-related 4, 3, 5
  • Total protein concentration 5
  • Fluid culture to detect bacterial peritonitis 6
  • Cytology to detect malignant cells 5
  • Optional tests, such as:
    • Cholesterol 5
    • Tumor markers 5
    • Lactate dehydrogenase 5
    • Adenosine deaminase (ADA) 5
    • Triglyceride 5
    • Amylase 5
    • Glucose 5
    • Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) 5

Diagnostic Algorithm

A diagnostic algorithm can be established based on the results of these tests to determine the etiology of ascites 5. For example:

  • If the PMN count is ≥250 cells/mm3, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is highly suspected 2, 3
  • If the SAAG is ≥1.1 g/dl, portal hypertension-related ascites is likely 4, 3, 5
  • If the SAAG is <1.1 g/dl, non-portal hypertension-related ascites, such as malignant ascites, is likely 3, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Differential diagnosis of ascites.

Seminars in liver disease, 1997

Research

Characterisation of bacteria in ascites--reporting the potential of culture-independent, molecular analysis.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.