What alternative treatment options are available for a 68-year-old female patient with osteoporosis, currently on Prolia (denosumab) injections, with a recent Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan showing worsening osteopenia in the lumbar spine and osteoporosis in the left hip?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 10, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For a 68-year-old female with worsening osteoporosis on Prolia (denosumab) who is experiencing insurance coverage issues, the most appropriate alternative treatment option is oral bisphosphonates, such as alendronate (Fosamax) 70mg once weekly, as recommended by the American College of Physicians 1. This recommendation is based on high-quality evidence that shows pharmacologic treatment with alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, or denosumab reduces the risk for hip and vertebral fractures in women with known osteoporosis. Some key points to consider when switching medications include:

  • Oral bisphosphonates are the most cost-effective first-line alternatives and work by inhibiting bone resorption, and are generally well-tolerated.
  • If oral medications aren't suitable, zoledronic acid (Reclast), an annual IV infusion, could be considered, though it may also have cost implications.
  • For patients who cannot tolerate bisphosphonates, raloxifene (Evista) 60mg daily is an option, particularly beneficial for postmenopausal women as it also reduces breast cancer risk.
  • Teriparatide (Forteo) or abaloparatide (Tymlos) are daily self-injections that build new bone but are typically reserved for severe cases due to their cost.
  • Regardless of medication choice, the patient should continue calcium supplementation (1000-1200mg daily) and vitamin D (800-1000 IU daily), along with weight-bearing exercises and fall prevention strategies, as recommended by the American College of Rheumatology 1. Given her worsening bone density despite Prolia treatment, a comprehensive evaluation of treatment effectiveness, adherence, and potential secondary causes of bone loss should be conducted before switching medications.

From the Research

Treatment Options for Osteoporosis

The patient is currently on Prolia injections for osteoporosis, but due to increased cost, they are seeking alternative treatment options.

  • Denosumab (Prolia) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of the nuclear factor kappaB ligand, which has been shown to improve bone mineral density and reduce the incidence of new fractures in postmenopausal women and men 2.
  • Other treatment options for osteoporosis include bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, ibandronate), osteoanabolic agents (teriparatide, abaloparatide, romosozumab), and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) 3, 4.
  • The selection of osteoporosis treatment should be individualized and based on a variety of factors, including underlying fracture risk, medical comorbidities, medication burden, as well as fracture risk reduction profiles, modes of administration, and side effects of treatment options 3.

Discontinuation of Denosumab

  • Discontinuation of denosumab may be considered in patients who have been treated for a certain period, but close monitoring is suggested due to the possibility of rebound fractures 5.
  • The optimal duration of use of denosumab has not been determined, and further study is needed to address questions regarding treatment duration and discontinuation 2, 5.

Comparison of Treatment Options

  • Denosumab has been compared to bisphosphonates, SERMs, and placebo in terms of effectiveness and safety, and has been shown to be effective in increasing bone mineral density and reducing the incidence of fractures 6.
  • Economic evaluations have shown that denosumab can be cost-effective in certain populations, such as postmenopausal women and older men with osteoporosis 4.
  • However, the cost-effectiveness of denosumab compared to other treatment options may vary depending on the population and the specific treatment regimen 4.

Related Questions

What is the significance of a 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture of 8.2% and a 10-year risk of hip fracture of 3.1%?
At what T-score should I initiate bisphosphonates (bone density medications)?
What alternative treatment options are available for a 68-year-old female patient with known osteoporosis, currently on Prolia (denosumab), who wishes to switch to a less expensive option, given her recent Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan results indicating osteopenia and osteoporosis?
What is the age limit for initiating bisphosphonates (Bone-Modifying Agents) therapy?
Should Prolia (denosumab) be continued or switched to Reclast (zoledronic acid), Forteo (teriparatide), or Evenity (romosozumab) for osteoporosis management?
What does elevated Gamma-Glutamyltransferase (GGT) indicate?
Can a 44-year-old female with radiating back pain to the leg, intact reflexes, and urinary incontinence, with a history of overactive bladder (OAB), be distinguished as having cauda equina syndrome versus overactive bladder?
What are two ways that Ursodiol (Ursodeoxycholic acid) reduces cholelithiasis formation?
What is the best course of action for a 45-year-old female with uncontrolled hypertension, presenting with intermittent paresthesia, and no primary care physician (PCP)?
What is the best method for resolving and preventing recurrent acneiform cysts on the back, potentially caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) exposure, in a physician who frequently drains abscesses?
What are the guidelines for the management of asthma (bronchial asthma)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.