What is the response rate for single-agent immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Response Rate for Single-Agent Immunotherapy in mCRC

The response rate for single-agent immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is generally low, ranging from 0-5% for checkpoint inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors 1. However, in patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors, the response rate can be higher, ranging from 20-40% for single agent pembrolizumab or nivolumab 1.

Key Findings

  • The immune-related objective response rates were 40% (95% CI, 12–74) in the dMMR CRC group, 0% (95% CI, 0–20) in the pMMR CRC group, and 71% (95% CI, 29–96) in the dMMR noncolorectal group 1.
  • Another phase II study, KEYNOTE-164, reported an ORR of 33% for both cohorts of patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC 1.
  • The CheckMate-142 trial reported an ORR of 31.1% (95% CI, 20.8–42.9) for patients with dMMR CRC treated with nivolumab, and 55% (95% CI, 45.2–63.8) for those treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab 1.

Treatment Considerations

  • The typical dose for pembrolizumab is 200mg every 3 weeks, and for nivolumab, it is 240mg every 2 weeks or 480mg every 4 weeks.
  • Treatment is usually continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is recommended as a subsequent-line treatment option in patients with metastatic MMR-deficient CRC who have not previously received a checkpoint inhibitor 1.

From the Research

Response Rate for Single-Agent Immunotherapy in mCRC

  • The response rate for single-agent immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited to patients with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) tumors 2.
  • A systematic review of clinical outcomes found that single PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade provides durable clinical response in mCRC patients with MSI-H, with response rates ranging from 20-30% 2.
  • The KEYNOTE-028 uncontrolled phase II trial demonstrated an impressive antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in patients with treatment-refractory Lynch-associated tumors, including colorectal cancer, with a response rate of 50% 3.
  • However, for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) mCRC, the response rate to single-agent immunotherapy is low, and combination therapies are being explored to overcome resistance 4, 5.

Predictive Biomarkers and Combination Therapies

  • Predictive biomarkers, such as tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status, are crucial in identifying patients who may benefit from immunotherapy 2, 4.
  • Combination therapies, such as nivolumab plus ipilimumab, have shown promising results in patients with MSI-H mCRC, with response rates ranging from 30-50% 6, 3.
  • Emerging evidence suggests that combination of immune modulators, such as regorafenib, may improve the responsiveness of MSS mCRC to checkpoint blockade 5.

Ongoing Research and Future Directions

  • Further research is needed to identify predictive biomarkers and develop effective immunotherapy strategies for patients with MSS mCRC 4, 5.
  • Investigative studies are underway to overcome tumor resistance in current immunotherapy approaches, including combination therapies and novel therapeutic strategies 4, 5.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.