Is Flomax (Tamsulosin) effective for women with ureteral stones measuring 4 millimeters in diameter?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Flomax (Tamsulosin) is not the preferred treatment for women with 4mm ureteral stones, as its effectiveness in this population is not well-established and the standard approach is usually conservative management with pain control and hydration. While alpha blockers, including tamsulosin, have been shown to facilitate ureteral stone passage in men, with a statistically significant 29% (CI: 20% to 37%) more patients passing their stones compared to controls 1, the evidence for its benefit in women is limited. The 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi suggests that alpha blockers, such as tamsulosin, are effective in facilitating stone passage, but this finding is primarily based on studies in men 1.

For women with 4mm ureteral stones, the standard approach is usually:

  • Conservative management with pain control and hydration, as most stones of this size will pass spontaneously within a few weeks
  • Pain management with NSAIDs or other analgesics, if needed
  • Urological intervention, such as ureteroscopy or shock wave lithotripsy, if the stone doesn't pass on its own or causes complications. These procedures are generally more effective and have a clearer benefit-risk profile for women with ureteral stones compared to using Flomax. The primary mechanism of action of Flomax involves relaxing smooth muscle in the prostate and bladder neck, which is less relevant in female anatomy, and while it may have some effect on the ureter, the evidence for its benefit in women is limited and inconsistent 1.

From the Research

Effectiveness of Flomax (Tamsulosin) for Women with Ureteral Stones

  • The effectiveness of Flomax (Tamsulosin) for women with ureteral stones measuring 4 millimeters in diameter is not directly addressed in the provided studies.
  • However, a study from 2014 2 compared the efficacy of different treatment strategies for distal ureteral stones smaller than 10 mm, including the use of tamsulosin.
  • The study found that patients who received conventional treatment and tamsulosin 0.4 mg orally daily for 4 weeks had a higher stone-free rate (59.5%) compared to those who received conventional treatment only (48.7%).
  • Another study from 2016 3 found that conservative management, which may include the use of medications like tamsulosin, was clinically effective for ureteral stones sized = 10 mm, with 96.1% of patients with stones 0-4mm managing to expel their ureteral stone.

Alternative Treatment Options

  • Ureteroscopy is considered a highly effective treatment option for distal ureteral stones smaller than 10 mm, with a stone-free rate of 95.6% in one study 2.
  • Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is also a treatment option for ureteral stones, but its effectiveness may depend on the size and location of the stone 4, 5.
  • The choice of treatment should be based on patient preference, published evidence, local audit, and cost 4.

Considerations for Women with Ureteral Stones

  • The provided studies do not specifically address the effectiveness of Flomax (Tamsulosin) for women with ureteral stones measuring 4 millimeters in diameter.
  • However, the studies suggest that conservative management, including the use of medications like tamsulosin, may be a viable treatment option for women with small ureteral stones 2, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.