What is the safety of Multaq (dronedarone) 400mg twice daily (BID) for atrial fibrillation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Multaq (dronedarone) 400mg twice daily is not recommended as a first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation due to its significant safety concerns, as highlighted in the most recent study from 2022 1.

Safety Concerns

The study emphasizes the importance of careful consideration when prescribing antiarrhythmic drugs, including dronedarone, due to their potential to increase the risk of bradycardia, atrioventricular block, and heart failure in patients with poor left ventricular function.

  • The medication can cause fatal hepatotoxicity, and its use is contraindicated in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, severe heart failure (NYHA class IV or recent decompensation), liver or lung toxicity, and QT prolongation.
  • Common side effects include gastrointestinal disturbances, fatigue, and skin reactions.

Monitoring and Precautions

Before starting Multaq, patients should have baseline liver function tests, pulmonary function assessment, and ECG monitoring, with regular follow-up evaluations every 3-6 months, as suggested by the 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation 1.

  • Patients should avoid grapefruit juice and certain medications that interact with Multaq, including strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, certain statins, and other antiarrhythmics.

Alternative Treatment Options

Alternative rhythm control options with better safety profiles include flecainide, propafenone, sotalol, or amiodarone, depending on the patient's cardiac structure and comorbidities, as recommended by the American Academy of Family Physicians and the American College of Physicians in 2003 1.

  • The choice of agent predominantly depends on specific risk of side effects based on patient characteristics.

From the FDA Drug Label

WARNING: INCREASED RISK OF DEATH, STROKE AND HEART FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH DECOMPENSATED HEART FAILURE OR PERMANENT ATRIAL FIBRILLATION In patients with symptomatic heart failure and recent decompensation requiring hospitalization or NYHA Class IV heart failure; MULTAQ doubles the risk of death. In patients with permanent atrial fibrillation, MULTAQ doubles the risk of death, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure. MULTAQ is contraindicated in patients with symptomatic heart failure with recent decompensation requiring hospitalization or NYHA Class IV heart failure. MULTAQ is contraindicated in patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) who will not or cannot be cardioverted into normal sinus rhythm.

The safety of Multaq 400mg BID for atrial fibrillation is a concern due to the increased risk of:

  • Death
  • Stroke
  • Heart failure in patients with decompensated heart failure or permanent atrial fibrillation. Multaq is contraindicated in patients with symptomatic heart failure with recent decompensation requiring hospitalization or NYHA Class IV heart failure, and in patients in atrial fibrillation who will not or cannot be cardioverted into normal sinus rhythm 2.

From the Research

Safety of Multaq 400mg BID for Atrial Fibrillation

  • The safety and efficacy of dronedarone (Multaq) for atrial fibrillation have been evaluated in several studies 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
  • Dronedarone has been shown to be safer than amiodarone but less effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm 3, 6.
  • The ATHENA trial demonstrated that dronedarone significantly reduced the incidence of hospitalization due to cardiovascular events or death in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation 5.
  • However, dronedarone is contraindicated in severe or deteriorating heart failure, and its use has been associated with increased mortality in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation 5, 7.
  • Real-world evidence suggests that dronedarone has a similar liver safety profile to other antiarrhythmics, and its use is not associated with a significant risk of proarrhythmia in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation 7.
  • The safety concerns associated with dronedarone, such as liver toxicity and increased mortality, must be balanced against its benefits in reducing hospitalizations and cardiovascular events in patients with non-permanent atrial fibrillation 7.

Adverse Effects

  • Common adverse effects of dronedarone include gastrointestinal disorders, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and cutaneous disorders 3.
  • Dronedarone has also been associated with transient elevation of creatinine levels and cases of renal failure 3.
  • The risk of stroke is similar among patients treated with dronedarone and other antiarrhythmic drugs 4.

Comparison with Other Antiarrhythmic Drugs

  • Dronedarone has been compared with other antiarrhythmic drugs, including amiodarone, class 1C agents, dofetilide, and sotalol 4.
  • Amiodarone has been shown to be more effective than dronedarone in maintaining normal sinus rhythm, but it has a higher risk of adverse effects 3, 4.
  • Class 1C agents and sotalol have been associated with lower rates of atrial fibrillation recurrence and hospitalization compared with dronedarone 4.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Dronedarone for atrial fibrillation: How does it compare with amiodarone?

Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2011

Research

Safety and efficacy of dronedarone from clinical trials to real-world evidence: implications for its use in atrial fibrillation.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.