What are Light's criteria?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 14, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Light's criteria are used to differentiate between exudative and transudative pleural effusions by analyzing the biochemical properties of pleural fluid, with a pleural effusion classified as an exudate if it meets at least one of the following criteria: pleural fluid protein to serum protein ratio greater than 0.5, pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6, or pleural fluid LDH greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal serum LDH, as outlined in the European Respiratory Journal study 1.

Key Criteria

  • Pleural fluid protein to serum protein ratio greater than 0.5
  • Pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6
  • Pleural fluid LDH greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal serum LDH These criteria help clinicians determine the underlying cause of pleural effusions, as transudates typically result from systemic factors like heart failure or cirrhosis that alter fluid dynamics, while exudates suggest localized pleural inflammation or disease such as infection, malignancy, or autoimmune conditions, with Light's criteria having approximately 98% sensitivity for identifying exudates, as reported in the European Respiratory Journal study 1.

Clinical Application

In clinical practice, Light's criteria are crucial for guiding further diagnostic workup and treatment decisions for patients with pleural effusions, although they may occasionally misclassify heart failure-related effusions as exudates in patients on diuretics, highlighting the need for careful interpretation of results in the context of individual patient characteristics and clinical presentation, as discussed in the European Respiratory Journal study 1.

Alternative Tests

Alternative tests, such as measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in pleural fluid or serum, may be useful in certain cases, particularly when Light's criteria provide results close to the cut-off points for an exudate in the presence of a high pre-test probability for heart failure or cirrhosis, with levels >1500 μg·mL−1 having a positive likelihood ratio of 7.8 and negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 in blood NT-proBNP, as reported in the European Respiratory Journal study 1.

From the Research

Definition of Light's Criteria

  • Light's criteria are used to classify pleural effusions into transudates and exudates 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
  • The criteria serve as a good starting point in the separation of transudates from exudates 4

Components of Light's Criteria

  • Pleural fluid protein to serum protein ratio
  • Pleural fluid LDH to serum LDH ratio
  • Pleural fluid LDH level 2, 5

Accuracy of Light's Criteria

  • Light's criteria have an accuracy of 93% in differentiating transudates from exudates 2, 5
  • However, the criteria may misclassify about 25% of transudates as exudates, especially in patients on diuretics 4, 5
  • The accuracy of Light's criteria may be lower in patients receiving diuretic therapy, with an accuracy of 83% 5

Comparison with Other Criteria

  • Serum effusion albumin gradient (SEAG) has a diagnostic accuracy of 92.42%, which is better than Light's criteria (87.87%) in differentiating transudative and exudative effusions 3
  • Combination of pleural cholesterol concentration and effusion LDH activity has a higher discriminatory potential than Light's criteria 2
  • Alternative biochemical criteria, such as serum-pleural fluid albumin and protein gradients, may not be significantly better than Light's criteria in patients receiving diuretics 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.