From the Research
For fibrous fat removal, Sono Bello generally offers better results than CoolSculpting, as it physically removes fat cells from the body, whereas CoolSculpting uses cryolipolysis to freeze and gradually eliminate fat cells over time, which may be less effective on fibrous fat deposits. The most recent and highest quality study, 1, published in 2025, evaluated the efficacy and safety of cryolipolysis in reducing local adipose tissue in women, but it did not specifically compare CoolSculpting to Sono Bello. However, another study, 2, published in 2023, reviewed research on cryolipolysis technology and found that it is safe and effective in reducing localized fat, but it may not be as effective on fibrous fat deposits.
Some key points to consider when choosing between Sono Bello and CoolSculpting include:
- Sono Bello is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that requires local anesthesia and some downtime, while CoolSculpting is non-invasive with no downtime
- Sono Bello provides more immediate and predictable results, especially for areas with stubborn fibrous fat like the abdomen, flanks, and back
- The cost for Sono Bello typically ranges from $2,500-$5,000 depending on treatment areas, while CoolSculpting generally costs $2,000-$4,000 for multiple sessions
- A consultation with a board-certified plastic surgeon or dermatologist is recommended to determine which option is best for your specific body type and fat composition, as noted in studies such as 3 and 4.
It's also important to note that while cryolipolysis has been shown to be effective in reducing localized fat, it may not be as effective on fibrous fat deposits, and more research is needed to fully understand its efficacy in different treatment areas, as noted in studies such as 5 and 2.