What laboratory tests are abnormal in von Willebrand disease (vWD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

In von Willebrand disease (vWD), several laboratory tests would be abnormal, including decreased von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen levels, reduced vWF activity (ristocetin cofactor activity), and sometimes a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), as well as abnormal vWF multimer analysis and platelet function tests, such as the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) and ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) 1.

Key Abnormalities

  • Decreased vWF antigen levels
  • Reduced vWF activity (ristocetin cofactor activity)
  • Prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
  • Abnormal vWF multimer analysis
  • Prolonged platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) closure times
  • Abnormal ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA)

Test Interpretation

The specific pattern of test abnormalities helps distinguish between the different subtypes of vWD (types 1, 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N, and 3), which is important for appropriate management 1.

Laboratory Evaluation

Initial laboratory evaluation for vWD should include measurements of blood plasma VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), VWF ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo), and factor VIII coagulant activity (FVIII) 1.

Specialized Testing

Multimer analysis, collagen binding, RIPA platelet binding, FVIII binding, platelet VWF studies, and DNA sequencing of the VWF gene may be performed in selected cases to further characterize the subtype of vWD and guide management 1.

From the Research

Abnormal Tests in von Willebrand Disease

The following tests may be abnormal in von Willebrand disease:

  • Bleeding time: abnormal in 43% of patients 2
  • Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT): abnormal in 25% of patients 2, and has an excellent diagnostic sensitivity and a satisfactory specificity for identifying isolated von Willebrand factor deficiencies 3
  • von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity: abnormal in 79% of patients 2, and is superior to vWF antigen or factor VIII:c in establishing the diagnosis of vWD 2
  • vWF antigen: abnormal in 58% of patients 2
  • Factor VIII:c: abnormal in 33% of patients 2
  • Multimeric analysis of vWF: necessary for diagnosis and classification of vWD, especially in patients with variant forms of the disease 4, 5
  • Ristocetin cofactor activity assay: used to confirm the diagnosis of vWD 5
  • Platelet count: may be normal or abnormal, but is often included in the initial screening for vWD 4, 2

Diagnostic Approach

The diagnostic approach to von Willebrand disease involves a combination of tests, including:

  • Initial screening: bleeding time, aPTT, platelet count, vWF antigen, and vWF activity 4, 2
  • Confirmatory tests: vWF:ristocetin cofactor activity assay, vWF:collagen-binding test, ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination, and factor VIII:coagulant activity 5
  • Further subtyping: multimeric analysis, vWF:factor VIII binding, and platelet vWF 5, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Is the activated partial thromboplastin time suitable to screen for von Willebrand factor deficiencies?

Blood coagulation & fibrinolysis : an international journal in haemostasis and thrombosis, 2007

Research

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand's disease.

Mayo Clinic proceedings, 1991

Research

Von Willebrand Disease: Current Status of Diagnosis and Management.

Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.