Is a respiratory (RESP) ejection fraction greater than 50% dangerous on an echocardiogram (echo)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

A right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) greater than 50% of systemic pressure on an echocardiogram is indeed dangerous and indicates significant pulmonary hypertension, with a five-year mortality of about 40% in patients with mean PA pressure >25 mm Hg 1. This finding warrants immediate medical attention and further evaluation. Patients with this finding should be referred to a cardiologist or pulmonologist for comprehensive assessment, which typically includes right heart catheterization to confirm the diagnosis and determine the specific cause. Some key points to consider in the evaluation of RVSP include:

  • The normal RVSP should be less than 35-40 mmHg, so a pressure exceeding 50% of systemic pressure (typically >60-70 mmHg) represents severe pulmonary hypertension that can rapidly progress without appropriate intervention 1.
  • Initial management may include oxygen therapy for hypoxemia, diuretics like furosemide 20-40mg daily if right heart failure is present, and potentially pulmonary vasodilators depending on the underlying etiology.
  • The underlying cause must be identified, as treatment approaches differ for pulmonary arterial hypertension versus pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease, lung disease, or chronic thromboembolic disease.
  • Echocardiographic signs indicative of the cause of clinical admission in acute cardiovascular conditions, such as systolic heart failure, heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection, pulmonary embolism, and tamponade, should be carefully evaluated 1.
  • A resting mean PA pressure < 20 mmHg or PA systolic pressure < 30mmHg appear to be a healthy (or optimal) pressure in the pulmonary circulation, and elevation in ePASP is a common and high-risk finding on echocardiogram 1.

From the Research

Respiratory Rate and Echo Results

  • A respiratory rate greater than 50 per minute can be an indicator of pneumonia in children with cough, as shown in a study published in 1990 2.
  • However, the provided studies do not directly address the relationship between a respiratory rate greater than 50% being dangerous on an echo.
  • Echo results are not explicitly mentioned in the provided studies, which focus on respiratory distress, COPD, and acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Respiratory Distress and COPD

  • Studies have investigated the treatment of adult patients with respiratory distress, including the use of oxygen, albuterol, and non-invasive ventilation 3, 4, 5.
  • The management of COPD exacerbations involves pharmacologic treatment, including bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and antibiotics, as well as non-invasive ventilation and oxygen therapy 4, 5.
  • These studies do not provide a direct link between respiratory rate and echo results.

Non-Invasive Ventilatory Support

  • Non-invasive ventilatory support, including high-flow nasal oxygen and non-invasive ventilation, can be used as first-line treatment for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and ARDS 6.
  • However, the effectiveness of these strategies depends on the severity of hypoxemia, and strict physiological monitoring is necessary to detect the need for endotracheal intubation.
  • The provided studies do not address the specific question of respiratory rate greater than 50% being dangerous on an echo.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.