What are the follow-up laboratory tests for Brucellosis (Brucella infection)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

For Brucella follow-up labs, I recommend repeat blood cultures, monitoring of complete blood count (CBC), liver function tests (LFTs), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) every 2-4 weeks during treatment, as well as checking serum agglutination titers at the end of treatment and 3-6 months later. The provided evidence from the 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults 1 does not directly address the follow-up laboratory tests for Brucellosis. However, based on general medical knowledge and the principles of managing infectious diseases, the recommended follow-up labs are crucial for assessing treatment efficacy and monitoring for complications.

  • Repeat blood cultures at 2-4 weeks after starting treatment confirm clearance of bacteremia.
  • Monitoring CBC, LFTs, and ESR every 2-4 weeks during treatment detects potential side effects of antibiotics and tracks the overall inflammatory response.
  • Checking serum agglutination titers at the end of treatment and 3-6 months later provides a quantitative measure of antibody response, with declining titers indicating successful treatment.
  • Performing imaging studies (e.g., CT, MRI) if there's suspicion of focal complications like endocarditis or osteomyelitis is also essential.
  • Considering testing renal function if using potentially nephrotoxic antibiotics is necessary to prevent further complications. These follow-up labs help assess treatment efficacy and monitor for complications, allowing for timely adjustments to treatment if needed, and improving outcomes in this potentially chronic infection.

From the Research

Follow-up Laboratory Tests for Brucellosis

The follow-up laboratory tests for Brucellosis (Brucella infection) include:

  • Standard agglutination test (SAT) and 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) tests, which are usually used in the follow-up of treated cases of human brucellosis 2
  • Rose Bengal Plate Test (RBPT), Standard Tube Agglutination Test (SAT), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect Brucella antibodies 3
  • Immunofluorescence staining (IFS) to detect intracellular Brucella antigens in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) 3
  • Brucella Enzyme Immunoassay and the Standard Agglutination with 2-Mercaptoethanol Test for the diagnosis and monitoring of brucellosis 4
  • Serum (tube) agglutination test (SAT) to measure antibody titers 5
  • Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) to monitor the evolution of Brucella melitensis DNA load during therapy and post-therapy follow-up 6

Laboratory Tests for Monitoring Therapeutic Efficacy

The laboratory tests used for monitoring therapeutic efficacy of brucellosis infection include:

  • SAT and 2-ME tests to monitor the levels of these tests after clinical cure in cases of brucellosis 2
  • IFS to detect intracellular Brucella antigens in PBMCs 3
  • Brucella Enzyme Immunoassay and the Standard Agglutination with 2-Mercaptoethanol Test to monitor the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis 4
  • Q-PCR to monitor the evolution of Brucella melitensis DNA load during therapy and post-therapy follow-up 6

Interpretation of Laboratory Test Results

The interpretation of laboratory test results for brucellosis includes:

  • Serologic cure is considered in the event of a SAT titer decrease to < or =1:160 or a 2-ME decrease to <1:80 2
  • The probability of serologic cure for patients with SAT titers < or =1:640 was higher than for those >1:640 2
  • The probability of serologic cure for patients with 2-ME titers < or =1:320 was higher than for those >1:320 2
  • The IgM ELISA showed higher sensitivity and specificity than the SAT-2Me for the diagnosis and monitoring of brucellosis 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.