What is the ICD‑10 code for pulmonary embolism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 9, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

ICD-10 Code for Pulmonary Embolism

The primary ICD-10 codes for pulmonary embolism are I26.0 (for PE with acute cor pulmonale) and I26.9 (for PE without acute cor pulmonale).

Specific Code Selection

When coding for pulmonary embolism, you need to distinguish between:

  • I26.0: Pulmonary embolism with mention of acute cor pulmonale (right ventricular dysfunction/failure)
  • I26.9: Pulmonary embolism without mention of acute cor pulmonale

The choice depends on whether the patient demonstrates right ventricular dysfunction or failure at presentation. If echocardiography or CT shows RV dysfunction, or if there are clinical signs of acute RV failure with hemodynamic compromise, I26.0 is appropriate. For PE without these features, use I26.9.

Critical Coding Accuracy Considerations

Be aware that ICD-10 codes for PE have significant limitations in administrative databases. Research demonstrates that PE codes have a sensitivity of only 91.1% and positive predictive value of 82.3% in emergency department data 1. More recent validation studies show that principal discharge codes alone miss approximately 40% of acute PEs, with sensitivity of only 58.3% despite excellent positive predictive value of 92.1% 2.

Common Coding Pitfalls

The largest source of coding errors stems from ambiguous physician documentation. Phrases like "rule out PE," "query PE," or "possible PE" frequently result in incorrect PE code assignment 1. In one study, 193 of 257 false-positive PE codes (75%) resulted from such ambiguous documentation.

To ensure accurate coding:

  • Document definitively whether PE is confirmed or excluded
  • Avoid ambiguous terminology in discharge diagnoses
  • Specify the presence or absence of RV dysfunction
  • Ensure imaging confirmation is clearly documented

Subsegmental PE Coding Limitations

For isolated subsegmental PE (issPE), ICD-10 codes perform particularly poorly, with sensitivity of only 7.0% and positive predictive value of 25.2% 3. These codes should not be relied upon for research or quality improvement initiatives involving subsegmental PE.

Documentation Best Practices

To optimize coding accuracy:

  • State explicitly: "Acute pulmonary embolism, confirmed by CTPA"
  • Document RV status: "with RV dysfunction" or "without RV dysfunction"
  • Avoid provisional language in final discharge diagnoses
  • Reference specific imaging findings that confirm the diagnosis

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.