Should we follow the pre-oxygenation trial protocol?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

We should follow the pre-oxygenation trial protocol, specifically using medication-assisted preoxygenation in patients undergoing Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) who are unable to tolerate a face mask, NIPPV, or HFNO due to agitation, delirium, or combative behavior. Preoxygenation is a critical step in preparing patients for intubation, as it helps create an oxygen reservoir in the lungs, providing a buffer against rapid desaturation during the apneic period of intubation 1. To implement preoxygenation:

  • Use a non-rebreather mask or other suitable device to administer 100% oxygen for 3-5 minutes before attempting intubation
  • Alternatively, consider using non-invasive positive pressure ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula for preoxygenation in patients with severe hypoxemia
  • Monitor oxygen saturation to ensure adequate preoxygenation The goal of preoxygenation is to achieve an end-tidal oxygen concentration of at least 90%, which can help prevent hypoxemia and its potential complications, such as cardiac arrest or neurological injury during intubation attempts 1. Key considerations for preoxygenation include:
  • Patient tolerance and ability to cooperate with the preoxygenation process
  • Severity of hypoxemia and need for alternative preoxygenation methods
  • Monitoring and adjustment of preoxygenation technique as needed to ensure adequate oxygenation.

From the Research

Pre-Oxygenation Trial Protocol

The decision to follow a pre-oxygenation trial protocol depends on various factors, including the specific context and the available evidence.

  • The study 2 discusses the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the PREOXI trial, which compares preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation versus oxygen mask among critically ill adults undergoing emergency tracheal intubation.
  • The primary outcome of the PREOXI trial is the incidence of hypoxemia, defined as a peripheral oxygen saturation <85% between induction and 2 minutes after intubation.
  • Another study 3 found that preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation resulted in a lower incidence of hypoxemia during intubation than preoxygenation with an oxygen mask.

Considerations

When considering whether to follow a pre-oxygenation trial protocol, the following points should be taken into account:

  • The effectiveness of noninvasive ventilation and oxygen mask preoxygenation for the prevention of hypoxemia during emergency tracheal intubation, as investigated in the PREOXI trial 2.
  • The results of the study 3, which suggest that preoxygenation with noninvasive ventilation may be a more effective strategy for reducing hypoxemia during intubation.
  • The potential risks and benefits of preoxygenation, including the risk of hypoxemia and the potential benefits of reducing this risk.

Related Studies

Other studies have investigated related topics, including:

  • The introduction of provisional approvals for medicines 4, which highlights the importance of caution when introducing new treatments.
  • The comparison of restrictive and liberal oxygen strategies in trauma patients 5, which found no significant difference in death and/or major respiratory complications between the two groups.
  • The evaluation of progressive exercise compared with best-practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for rotator cuff disorders 6, which found no evidence of a difference in shoulder pain and function between the progressive exercise intervention and the best-practice advice intervention.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.