What is the recommended management of a patient presenting with severe flank pain from a computed tomography (CT) urogram-confirmed ureteric stone?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The recommended management of a patient with severe flank pain from a CT urogram-confirmed ureteric stone involves a combination of pain control, medical expulsive therapy, and appropriate follow-up, with a strong consideration for surgical treatment for stones >10 mm.

Initial Management

Initial management should focus on adequate analgesia with NSAIDs such as ketorolac (30mg IV or 10mg oral every 6 hours) as first-line treatment, which provides effective pain relief while reducing ureteral smooth muscle tone and inflammation 1. Opioids like morphine (2-5mg IV) or hydrocodone/acetaminophen (5-10mg/325mg oral every 4-6 hours) may be added for breakthrough pain.

Medical Expulsive Therapy

Medical expulsive therapy with tamsulosin 0.4mg daily should be considered for stones <10mm to facilitate passage by relaxing ureteral smooth muscle 1.

Surgical Treatment

For ureteral stones >10 mm, surgical treatment is often required, with both shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopic removal (URS) being acceptable first-line treatments, although URS is associated with higher complication rates but better stone-free rates 1.

Follow-up

Patients should strain their urine to capture passed stones for analysis, and follow-up imaging with low-dose CT or ultrasound is recommended after 2-4 weeks to confirm stone passage.

Key Considerations

  • Urgent urological intervention is indicated for patients with signs of infection (fever, pyuria), intractable pain, renal impairment, or stones unlikely to pass due to size (>10mm) or location.
  • Preventive measures including increased fluid intake and dietary modifications should be discussed based on stone composition once analyzed.
  • Patients should be informed about the existing active treatment modalities, including the relative benefits and risks associated with each modality, such as stone-free rates, anesthesia requirements, need for additional procedures, and associated complications 1.

From the Research

Management of Ureteric Stones

The management of ureteric stones involves various treatment options, including:

  • Conservative treatment
  • Medical expulsion therapy
  • Interventional stone treatment such as ureteral stenting, ureteroscopy, and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) 2
  • Oral chemolysis in selected cases 2

Medical Expulsive Therapy

Alpha-blockers are commonly used as medical expulsive therapy (MET) to improve stone passage, with studies showing that they may increase stone clearance and reduce the risk of major adverse events 3

  • A meta-analysis of 67 studies with 10,509 participants found that treatment with an alpha-blocker may result in a large increase in stone clearance, with a risk ratio of 1.45 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.55) 3
  • However, the quality of evidence was low, and a subset of higher-quality, placebo-controlled trials suggested that the likely effect is probably smaller, with a risk ratio of 1.16 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.25) 3

Imaging Modalities

The use of imaging modalities such as ultrasonography (US) and unenhanced helical CT (UHCT) can help diagnose and manage acute flank pain caused by ureteric stones 4

  • UHCT has been shown to be superior in detecting ureteral stones, with a sensitivity and specificity of 98-100% regardless of size, location, and chemical composition 4

Treatment Options for Proximal Ureteric Stones

For proximal ureteric stones, both ESWL and ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URSL) are effective treatment options, with no significant difference in stone-free ratio or complications 5

  • A prospective hospital-based study of 90 patients with upper ureteric calculus found that the total stone-free ratio was 88.9% for ESWL and 82.2% for URSL 5

Use of Alpha-Blockers after ESWL

The use of alpha-blockers after ESWL may enhance stone clearance, with a meta-analysis of seven trials showing a pooled absolute risk difference of 16% (95% CI 5-27%) in favor of the alpha-blocker group 6

  • The pooled mean difference in expulsion time was 8 (-3-20) days in favor of the alpha-blocker group, and pain and analgesic usage were reported to be lower with alpha-blocker treatment 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.