What is the comparison between glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) patch and prazosin?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

GTN patches are the preferred choice for angina prevention, while prazosin is preferred for hypertension, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or PTSD-related nightmares. GTN patches are primarily used for angina prevention by dilating blood vessels, particularly coronary arteries, through nitric oxide release, as stated in the 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline for the management of patients with chronic coronary disease 1. They're applied to the skin, typically starting at 5mg/24hr and worn for 12-14 hours daily with a patch-free period to prevent tolerance. Common side effects include headache and dizziness.

Prazosin, an alpha-1 blocker, is mainly used for hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia, though it's also prescribed off-label for PTSD-related nightmares, as supported by the position paper for the treatment of nightmare disorder in adults by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 1. It's taken orally, starting at 1mg at bedtime and gradually increased as needed, with potential side effects of dizziness and first-dose hypotension.

The choice between these medications depends entirely on the condition being treated - GTN for angina and prazosin for hypertension, BPH, or PTSD nightmares. They work through different mechanisms and aren't interchangeable alternatives for the same conditions. According to the 2012 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, GTN is contraindicated after the use of sildenafil within the previous 24 h or tadalafil within 48 h or with hypotension 1.

Key differences between GTN patches and prazosin include:

  • Indications: GTN for angina, prazosin for hypertension, BPH, or PTSD nightmares
  • Mechanism of action: GTN dilates coronary arteries through nitric oxide release, prazosin blocks alpha-1 adrenergic receptors
  • Administration: GTN patches applied to the skin, prazosin taken orally
  • Side effects: GTN - headache, dizziness; prazosin - dizziness, first-dose hypotension

In summary, the choice between GTN patches and prazosin should be based on the specific condition being treated, with GTN preferred for angina and prazosin preferred for hypertension, BPH, or PTSD nightmares, as supported by the most recent and highest quality evidence 1.

From the Research

Comparison of GTN Patch and Prazosin

  • The provided studies do not directly compare GTN patch and prazosin, but they discuss the efficacy of GTN patch in various conditions, such as acute stroke and angina.
  • GTN patch has been shown to be safe and effective in lowering blood pressure and improving outcomes in acute stroke patients when administered within 2-6 hours of stroke onset 2, 3.
  • In the treatment of angina, GTN patch has been found to be effective in reducing angina frequency and improving exercise tolerance, but its effect may be limited by the development of tolerance 4.
  • Prazosin, an alpha-blocker, is not mentioned in the provided studies, but it is commonly used to treat hypertension and benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  • There is no direct evidence to compare the efficacy of GTN patch and prazosin in the provided studies.

Potential Uses of GTN Patch

  • GTN patch may be useful in improving peripheral circulation in children with severe neurodisability and poor capillary return 5.
  • It may also have a role in healing persistent skin ulcers in these children.
  • The patch has been found to be relatively well-tolerated in children, with minor adverse effects reported in some cases.

Limitations of the Studies

  • The studies provided do not directly compare GTN patch and prazosin, making it difficult to determine which treatment is more effective.
  • The studies have different focuses, including acute stroke, angina, and peripheral circulation in children, which limits the ability to draw conclusions about the comparative efficacy of GTN patch and prazosin.
  • Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms of benefit or harm of GTN patch in ultra/hyperacute stroke patients 2 and to compare its efficacy with other treatments, including prazosin.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.