What are the screening recommendations for a patient with a previous Pap (Papanicolau) test negative for cellular changes and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) negative, and a subsequent Pap test also negative for cellular changes but with a low-risk HPV positive result?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Based on the most recent guidelines, a patient with a history of negative Pap tests for cellular changes and a previous non-high-risk HPV positive result that has now cleared, should return to routine cervical cancer screening, which typically involves a Pap test every 3 years, or co-testing (Pap plus HPV test) every 5 years if between 30-65 years old. The current guidelines, as outlined in the 2021 sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines 1, emphasize the importance of risk-based management for abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. Given the patient's history of negative Pap tests and the previous non-high-risk HPV positive result that has now cleared, the risk of developing cervical cancer in the near future is considered low. Key points to consider in this scenario include:

  • The patient's previous non-high-risk HPV positive result has cleared, indicating the immune system has successfully eliminated the virus, which is a common occurrence as most HPV infections resolve on their own within 1-2 years 1.
  • The current negative Pap test and HPV negative result support the decision to return to routine screening, as the risk of underlying high-grade disease is low in this context.
  • It is essential to continue with regular screening as recommended by the healthcare provider, as early detection of any changes is crucial for preventing cervical cancer.
  • If there are any additional risk factors, such as immunosuppression or previous abnormal results not mentioned, the provider might recommend more frequent screening, but based on the information provided, routine screening intervals are appropriate. The management approach should always prioritize the patient's individual risk factors and history, but in this case, returning to routine cervical cancer screening is the recommended course of action, based on the guidelines outlined in the 2021 sexually transmitted infections treatment guidelines 1.

From the Research

Screening Recommendations

  • For women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive, current US guidelines recommend returning in 1 year, and those who remain HPV-positive or have low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or worse Pap results be referred for colposcopy 2.
  • A study found that women with an unsatisfactory Papanicolaou (Pap) test and negative human papillomavirus (HPV) cotest may be safely called back at an interval longer than 4 months 3.
  • HPV testing is recommended for women of any age for the clarification of atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and as an option for follow-up of women with HPV-positive ASC-US, atypical squamous cells "cannot rule out high-grade," or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions not found to have CIN 2/3 4.
  • Women testing HPV negative/ASC-US were found to have precancer/cancer risks that were more closely aligned with women with negative Pap test results, suggesting that women testing HPV negative/ASC-US should be managed similarly to women testing negative on Pap tests with a 3-year return for screening 5.
  • The addition of an HPV test to the Pap test to screen women in their mid-30s for cervical cancer reduces the incidence of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected by subsequent screening examinations 6.

Specific Screening Intervals

  • Women who test Pap-negative and HPV-negative can return in 3 years for screening 5.
  • Women who test Pap-negative but are HPV-positive should return in 1 year for screening 2.
  • Women with an unsatisfactory Pap test and negative HPV cotest may be safely called back at an interval longer than 4 months 3.

Risk of Precancer/Cancer

  • The 5-year CIN 3+ risk after an HPV-positive/Pap-negative cotest result was 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.2%-4.8%) 2.
  • The 5-year cancer risk was 0.34% (95% CI = 0.26%-0.45%) 2.
  • Women testing HPV negative/ASC-US were found to have precancer/cancer risks that were more closely aligned with women with negative Pap test results 5.

Related Questions

What is the management approach for a 52-year-old patient with Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS) and a negative Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test, with no previous history of cervical abnormalities?
What are the next steps for a 30-year-old female with a negative PAP (Papanicolau test)/HPV (Human Papillomavirus) result for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy?
What is the next step for a 59-year-old female with a Pap result showing Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance (ASC-US) and a negative Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test?
What is the recommended next step for a patient with a Pap (Papanicolau) result of ASC-US (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance) and HPV (Human Papillomavirus) negative?
What are the next steps for a patient with a normal Papanicolaou (Pap) test but positive for Human Papillomavirus (HPV)?
What is the assessment and management plan for a 39-year-old female with elevated Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, normal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and borderline total cholesterol, who is not currently taking a statin, and has a blood pressure of 124/82?
What is the best course of treatment for a 26-year-old male with low back pain, disc degeneration, and bilateral nerve pain, with a history of Vitamin B12 deficiency?
What is the diagnostic approach for non-traumatic headaches without Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computed Tomography (CT) scan?
Is a dose increase of Bupropion (Wellbutrin) recommended for a 24-year-old female patient who was restarted on 150mg daily on 5/13 after a few months' hiatus, given her current stress due to a sick family member?
Can confirmation of an infectious pathology in pediatric oncology patients guide management, including choice of antimicrobial (antibiotic) therapy and duration of treatment?
What imaging is recommended for nephrolithiasis (kidney stone)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.