What is the differential diagnosis and workup for a 35-year-old male with a history of prior back injury, presenting with back spasm and fatigue after an electrical shock from a wet extension cord, with no reported history of heart conditions, but a previous calcium score (Coronary Artery Calcium score)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis for the Patient

The patient's presentation after an electrical shock with back spasm, tiredness, and a history of prior back injury requires a thorough evaluation to determine the cause of his symptoms. The differential diagnosis can be categorized as follows:

  • Single Most Likely Diagnosis
    • Musculoskeletal strain or exacerbation of previous back injury: The patient's history of a prior back injury and the onset of back spasm after the electrical shock suggest that his symptoms could be related to a musculoskeletal issue, possibly exacerbated by the shock or the fall, if any, that occurred during the incident.
  • Other Likely Diagnoses
    • Electrical injury without significant internal damage: Electrical shocks can cause muscle contractions and pain without necessarily leading to severe internal injuries. The patient's symptoms of back spasm and tiredness could be a direct result of the electrical shock.
    • Anxiety or stress reaction: The traumatic nature of experiencing an electrical shock could lead to an anxiety or stress reaction, manifesting as tiredness and possibly exacerbating any pre-existing musculoskeletal issues.
  • Do Not Miss Diagnoses
    • Cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial injury: Although the patient denies chest pain and palpitations, electrical shocks can cause cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial injury, which may not always present with typical symptoms. It is crucial to rule out cardiac involvement due to the potential for severe outcomes.
    • Spinal cord injury: Given the patient's history of back injury and the new onset of back spasm after the shock, there is a possibility, although less likely, of a spinal cord injury that needs to be evaluated promptly.
  • Rare Diagnoses
    • Rhabdomyolysis: This is a rare but serious condition that can occur after electrical injuries, where muscle breakdown leads to the release of myoglobin into the bloodstream, potentially causing kidney damage.
    • Neurological sequelae of electrical injury: Some patients may experience neurological symptoms after an electrical shock, including neuropathies or central nervous system effects, although these are less common.

Workup

The workup for this patient should include:

  • A thorough history and physical examination, focusing on the neurological and cardiovascular systems.
  • Electrocardiogram (ECG) to evaluate for any cardiac arrhythmias or signs of myocardial injury.
  • Basic metabolic panel and creatine kinase levels to assess for rhabdomyolysis.
  • Urinalysis to check for myoglobinuria.
  • Imaging studies (e.g., X-rays, CT, or MRI of the spine) if there is suspicion of a new spinal injury or exacerbation of a previous condition.
  • Consideration of cardiac monitoring for a period to detect any potential arrhythmias.
  • A review of the patient's previous calcium score and any relevant cardiac history to assess cardiovascular risk.

Given the patient's presentation and history, a comprehensive approach is necessary to ensure that all potential causes of his symptoms are considered and appropriately managed.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.