What is the classification of Masquelet and Nachreiner (Masquelet and Nachreiner) induced membrane flap?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

The Mahes and Nahe flap classification is not a widely recognized system, and the most recent and highest quality study suggests a broadened classification of free-style flaps into three categories: angiosomal, extra-angiosomal, and neoangiosomal flaps 1. This classification is based on the concept of perforasome, which involves the study of the territory and linking of perforator vessels. The angiosomal category includes all traditional perforator flaps and their variations, while the extra-angiosomal category includes flaps that are manufactured to include tissue from a different angiosome. The neoangiosomal category includes flaps based on the process of neoangiogenesis on autologous or allogenous tissue.

Some key points to consider when classifying flaps include:

  • The position of the supplying perforator
  • The reconstructive necessities and the skin island
  • The flap blood supply
  • The aesthetic and functional demands of the reconstructed areas Understanding this classification helps surgeons select the most appropriate flap for specific reconstructive needs based on the defect location, size, and tissue requirements, as well as the patient's overall condition and available donor sites 1.

It's worth noting that other studies have discussed different types of flaps, such as random pattern flaps and axial pattern flaps, and their characteristics and applications in reconstructive surgery 2, 3, 4. However, the most recent and highest quality study suggests that the broadened classification of free-style flaps is a more comprehensive and useful system for surgeons 1.

In terms of morbidity, mortality, and quality of life, the choice of flap classification system can have a significant impact on patient outcomes. For example, a study found that sensory recovery after reconstruction was observed with all flap types, and better sensory recovery can be achieved in a shorter time postsurgery using random pattern flaps 2. Therefore, it is recommended to use the broadened classification of free-style flaps to guide flap selection and reconstruction strategies, in order to optimize patient outcomes and minimize morbidity and mortality 1.

References

Research

Laser Doppler imaging of axial and random pattern flaps in the maxillo-facial area. A preliminary report.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.