Which is better for neuropathic pain, gabapentin or amitriptyline?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 22, 2025 • View editorial policy

From the Guidelines

Gabapentin is generally considered the first-line treatment for neuropathic pain and may be better tolerated than amitriptyline. For most patients, start with gabapentin:

  • Initial dose: 300 mg once daily at bedtime
  • Gradually increase to 300 mg three times daily
  • Can be further increased up to 1800 mg daily in divided doses if needed If gabapentin is not effective or poorly tolerated, try amitriptyline:
  • Start with 10-25 mg once daily at bedtime
  • Gradually increase to 25-150 mg daily as needed and tolerated Gabapentin works by modulating calcium channels in nerve cells, reducing abnormal pain signaling. It has fewer side effects and drug interactions compared to amitriptyline, as noted in a recent guideline by the American Academy of Neurology 1. Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, affects multiple neurotransmitters and can be very effective but may cause more side effects, especially in older adults. Some key points to consider when prescribing these medications include:
  • Gabapentin has a nonlinear pharmacokinetic profile, requiring careful titration 2
  • Amitriptyline can have anticholinergic side effects, which may be dose-limiting, especially in individuals 65 years or older 1
  • Monitor for side effects with either medication, including dizziness, drowsiness, dry mouth, constipation, and adjust dosage as needed for efficacy and tolerability The most recent and highest quality study supports the use of gabapentin as a first-line treatment for neuropathic pain, citing its efficacy and relatively favorable side effect profile 1.

From the Research

Comparison of Gabapentin and Amitriptyline for Neuropathic Pain

  • There are no direct comparisons between gabapentin and amitriptyline in the provided studies, but the efficacy of gabapentin in treating neuropathic pain is well-documented 3, 4, 5, 6, 7.
  • Gabapentin has been shown to be effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain syndromes, including postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy 4, 6, 7.
  • The optimal dosing schedule for gabapentin in neuropathic pain is typically started at a dose of 900 mg/d and titrated up to 1800-3600 mg/d for greater efficacy 4, 6.
  • Gabapentin has been found to have a favorable side effect profile, with common adverse events including dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema 4, 6, 7.
  • Amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant, is also used to treat neuropathic pain, but its use is limited by unwanted side effects and a risk of cardiovascular mortality 4.
  • Further research is needed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of gabapentin and amitriptyline in treating neuropathic pain.

Mechanism of Action of Gabapentin

  • Gabapentin's mechanism of action in neuropathic pain involves binding to the α2δ-1 subunit of voltage-gated calcium channels, which inhibits nerve injury-induced trafficking of calcium channels and reduces pain transmission 5.
  • Gabapentin may also act on other targets, including transient receptor potential channels, NMDA receptors, protein kinase C, and inflammatory cytokines, to produce its analgesic effects 5.

Efficacy of Gabapentin in Neuropathic Pain

  • Gabapentin has been shown to be effective in reducing pain and improving quality of life in patients with neuropathic pain syndromes, with around 3 or 4 out of 10 participants achieving at least 50% pain relief 6.
  • The evidence for gabapentin's efficacy in neuropathic pain is moderate to high quality, with most studies showing significant reductions in pain intensity and improvements in quality of life 6, 7.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.