What is the best beta blocker for treating sinus tachycardia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the FDA Drug Label

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Mechanism of Action Metoprolol is a beta 1-selective (cardioselective) adrenergic receptor blocker.

Clinical pharmacology studies have demonstrated the beta-blocking activity of metoprolol, as shown by (1) reduction in heart rate and cardiac output at rest and upon exercise, (2) reduction of systolic blood pressure upon exercise, (3) inhibition of isoproterenol-induced tachycardia, and (4) reduction of reflex orthostatic tachycardia

Animal and human experiments indicate that metoprolol slows the sinus rate and decreases AV nodal conduction

The best beta blocker for sinus tachycardia is metoprolol 1, as it has been shown to slow the sinus rate and decrease AV nodal conduction, thus reducing heart rate.

  • Metoprolol is a beta 1-selective adrenergic receptor blocker, which means it primarily affects the heart rate and cardiac output.
  • It has been demonstrated to reduce heart rate and cardiac output at rest and upon exercise, making it a suitable option for treating sinus tachycardia.
  • Atenolol 2 also has a negative chronotropic effect due to beta blockade of the SA node, but the information provided does not directly compare the two drugs in the context of treating sinus tachycardia.

From the Research

For sinus tachycardia, ivabradine is a more effective treatment option than beta blockers, such as metoprolol, due to its ability to reduce heart rate without compromising hemodynamics, as shown in a study published in 2013 3. When considering treatment options for sinus tachycardia, it's essential to weigh the benefits and risks of each medication.

  • Ivabradine has been shown to be effective in reducing heart rate and alleviating symptoms in patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia, with a significant reduction in resting heart rate and an even larger decrease in heart rate during daily activity 3.
  • Metoprolol, a beta blocker, can also reduce heart rate, but it may not be as effective in relieving symptoms during exercise or daily activity, and it can cause hypotension or bradycardia in some patients 3.
  • A study published in 2016 found that ivabradine is effective and safe in the short- and medium-term treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia, with a significant reduction in heart rate and symptoms 4.
  • Another study published in 2021 reviewed the pathophysiological basis of inappropriate sinus tachycardia and its management options, including ivabradine, beta blockers, and calcium channel blockers, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment approaches 5.
  • While metoprolol may be effective in some cases, the most recent and highest-quality evidence suggests that ivabradine is a better treatment option for sinus tachycardia, particularly in patients who are unresponsive to beta blockers or have contraindications to their use 6.

References

Research

Metoprolol succinate vs. ivabradine in the treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia in patients unresponsive to previous pharmacological therapy.

Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2013

Research

Treatment of inappropriate sinus tachycardia with ivabradine.

Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2016

Research

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia: a review.

Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2021

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.