What are the treatment options for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) should prioritize cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies as first-line interventions, as they have shown significant improvements in health function, health-related quality of life, and physical function in patients with CFS, as supported by the 2022 study published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings 1.

Key Recommendations

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy has the greatest evidence for improving health function, health-related quality of life, and physical function in patients with CFS, with multiple studies demonstrating significant benefits 1.
  • Mindfulness-based therapies, such as mindfulness-based stress reduction and meditation awareness training, have also shown strong evidence for reducing functional impairment and improving quality of life in patients with CFS 1.
  • Exercise, including yoga and tai chi, can be beneficial for patients with CFS, but should be started very conservatively to avoid post-exertional malaise 1.
  • Pharmacological interventions, such as low-dose antidepressants and pain management medications, may be considered on a case-by-case basis, but should not be the primary treatment approach 1.

Important Considerations

  • Treatment effectiveness varies significantly between individuals, and patients should work closely with healthcare providers to develop a personalized approach that addresses their specific symptoms and adjusts as needed over time.
  • The use of stimulants, such as modafinil, should be approached with caution and only considered under the guidance of a healthcare provider, as the evidence for their effectiveness in CFS is limited and they may have significant side effects 1.
  • Non-pharmacological interventions, such as sleep hygiene practices, nutritional support, and stress management, should be prioritized as part of a comprehensive treatment plan for CFS.

From the Research

Treatment Options for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and graded exercise therapy (GET) are promoted as evidence-based treatments for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome 2, 3, 4, 5.
  • CBT has been shown to improve physical function and fatigue in patients with mild to moderate chronic fatigue syndrome 6.
  • GET can also improve outcomes for chronic fatigue syndrome, but patients' organizations have reported that these treatments can be harmful and favor pacing and specialist health care 2, 4.
  • Pacing therapy is the most favored treatment with the lowest negative response rate and the highest reported benefit, with 44%-82% of patients reporting benefits 2.
  • Adaptive pacing therapy (APT) is not an effective addition to specialist medical care for chronic fatigue syndrome 4.
  • There is insufficient evidence about the effectiveness of pharmacological, supplements, complementary/alternative, and other interventions for chronic fatigue syndrome 5.

Effectiveness of Treatments

  • CBT and GET can safely be added to specialist medical care to moderately improve outcomes for chronic fatigue syndrome 4.
  • A 16-week standard CBT intervention improves physical function and fatigue in CFS outpatients with mild to moderate disease 6.
  • A shorter 8-week interpersonal oriented CBT program improves physical function, but the effect on fatigue is not substantial 6.
  • The positive change in physical function persists at 1-year follow-up for both treatment groups, and for standard CBT also in fatigue 6.

Safety of Treatments

  • Serious adverse reactions were recorded in a small percentage of participants in the APT, CBT, and GET groups 4.
  • No serious adverse reactions were recorded in any of the groups during the trial period of a consecutive randomized controlled trial of standard and short CBT interventions 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.