What is Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for the prostate?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System) is a standardized scoring system used to evaluate MRI findings of the prostate to detect and classify suspicious lesions that may indicate prostate cancer, with a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of clinically significant cancer, as supported by the most recent guidelines 1.

Key Points

  • The system uses a 5-point scale where higher scores indicate a greater likelihood of clinically significant cancer, with PI-RADS 1 indicating a very low probability of cancer, PI-RADS 2 suggesting low probability, PI-RADS 3 representing an intermediate/equivocal risk, PI-RADS 4 indicating a high probability, and PI-RADS 5 signifies a very high probability of clinically significant cancer.
  • The assessment incorporates findings from T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, with different sequences given priority depending on the prostate zone being evaluated (peripheral zone versus transition zone) 1.
  • For patients with PI-RADS scores of 4 or 5, targeted biopsies are typically recommended, while those with scores of 1 or 2 may avoid unnecessary biopsies, as suggested by recent studies 1.
  • PI-RADS 3 lesions often require clinical correlation with other factors like PSA levels and digital rectal exam findings to determine management, as emphasized in the latest guidelines 1.

Management Priorities

  • Perform MRI before a confirmatory biopsy if no MRI has been performed before the initial biopsy, as recommended by the latest guidelines 1.
  • Take both targeted biopsy (of any PI-RADS 3 lesion) and systematic biopsy if a confirmatory biopsy is performed, as suggested by recent studies 1.
  • Consider MRI-targeted biopsy for patients with PI-RADS scores of 4 or 5, as supported by the most recent evidence 1.

From the Research

PI-RADS Prostatic Scores

  • The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score is a method of risk stratification for men with prostate cancer, using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to assign a score indicating the likelihood of clinically significant prostate cancer 2.
  • Studies have shown that PI-RADS scores are associated with biochemical control and distant metastasis in men with intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy 2.
  • A PI-RADS score of ≤3,4, or 5 has been defined, with a median nodule size of 0,8, and 18 mm, respectively, and men with PI-RADS ≤ 3,4, or 5 disease had 7-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) of 100%, 92%, and 65%, respectively 2.

Prognostic Significance of PI-RADS Scores

  • The prognostic significance of PI-RADS scores in prostate cancer patients has been investigated, with results showing that PI-RADS 5 lesions are associated with a significantly poorer postoperative prognosis 3.
  • Univariate and multivariable analyses have revealed that PI-RADS scores are independently associated with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy, with PI-RADS 5 lesions having a higher risk of recurrence compared to PI-RADS 3 or 4 lesions 3.
  • PI-RADS scores have also been shown to be associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology, with higher PI-RADS scores indicating a higher risk of upstaging 4.

Impact of Visible Tumor on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology

  • The impact of visible tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on upgrading and adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy has been investigated, with results showing that PI-RADS 4-5 lesions are independent predictors of upgrading and adverse pathology in low-risk prostate cancer patients 5.
  • The number of positive cores and tumor volume have been shown to be significantly associated with upgrading and adverse pathology, with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions having a higher risk of adverse pathology compared to PI-RADS 3 lesions 5.

Risk Stratification of Prostate Cancer According to PI-RADS Categories

  • A meta-analysis of prospective studies has shown that PI-RADS version 2 categories can be used for risk stratification of prostate cancer, with pooled detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer monotonically increasing for each PI-RADS category 6.
  • The detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer have been shown to be 4% for category 1-2,17% for category 3,46% for category 4, and 75% for category 5, with substantial study heterogeneity noted in categories 1-2 and 4 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.