What percentage of transgender adults undergo genital (bottom) surgery?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: August 12, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Statistical Rates of Bottom Surgery Among Transgender Individuals

Based on available data, approximately 13-35% of transgender individuals undergo genital (bottom) surgery, with significant variation based on population studied, insurance coverage, and time period examined.

Key Statistical Findings

The most relevant research data comes from a 2017 study of transgender endocrinology patients at an urban safety net hospital, which found that only 13% had undergone genital surgery or gonadectomy 1. This study examined 99 transgender patients (28 trans men and 71 trans women) treated between 2004-2015, immediately prior to insurance expansion that made gender-affirming surgery more affordable. Overall, 35% had undergone at least one type of gender-affirming surgery, but genital procedures specifically were uncommon 1.

Important Context and Trends

Demographic Differences

  • Trans men were more likely to have had any surgery than trans women (54% vs. 28%) 1
  • However, this included all gender-affirming surgeries, not just genital procedures
  • Chest surgery was more common (25%) than genital surgery (13%) 1

Temporal Trends

More recent data shows dramatic increases in overall gender-affirming surgery utilization, with procedures increasing nearly 500% between 2016 and 2021 (from 421 to 2,224 procedures annually) 2. However, this encompasses all types of gender-affirming surgeries, not exclusively bottom surgery.

Why Bottom Surgery Rates Are Lower

The relatively low rate of genital surgery may be attributable to several factors 1:

  • Financial cost - historically the most significant barrier
  • Lack of interest in surgery - not all transgender individuals desire genital surgery
  • Priority differences - surgery to change visible features (face, chest) may be higher priority than genital surgery

Clinical Implications

Regret rates following gender-affirming surgery are extremely low (approximately 1-2%) 3, 4. When regret does occur, it is typically due to negative social factors (poor family support, workplace mistreatment, suboptimal cosmetic outcomes) rather than the decision itself 3.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume all transgender individuals desire genital surgery - gender affirmation is highly individualized
  • Recognize that insurance coverage significantly impacts access - rates may increase as coverage expands
  • Understand that visible surgeries (chest, facial) are often prioritized over genital procedures

The 13% figure from the 2017 study 1 likely represents a conservative estimate from a pre-insurance expansion era, while current rates may be higher given improved access and the 500% increase in overall gender-affirming procedures 2.

References

Research

PREVALENCE AND TYPES OF GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERY AMONG A SAMPLE OF TRANSGENDER ENDOCRINOLOGY PATIENTS PRIOR TO STATE EXPANSION OF INSURANCE COVERAGE.

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, 2017

Research

Trends in Gender-Affirming Surgeries in the United States from 2010 to 2021.

Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India, 2024

Guideline

update in adult transgender medicine.

Annual Review of Medicine, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.