What is the treatment for Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) positive blood culture?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Treatment for ESBL (Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase) positive blood cultures typically requires carbapenems as first-line therapy, with meropenem (1g IV every 8 hours), imipenem (500mg IV every 6 hours), or ertapenem (1g IV daily) being the preferred options for initial treatment, as recommended by recent guidelines 1.

Key Considerations

  • Therapy should continue for 7-14 days depending on the source of infection, with longer durations needed for complicated infections.
  • While awaiting culture results, empiric coverage with a carbapenem is recommended if ESBL is suspected.
  • Alternative options for susceptible ESBL strains include piperacillin-tazobactam (4.5g IV every 6 hours), ceftazidime-avibactam (2.5g IV every 8 hours), or fosfomycin for urinary sources.

Rationale

  • ESBL enzymes hydrolyze most beta-lactam antibiotics including penicillins and cephalosporins, but cannot effectively break down carbapenems.
  • The recent challenges in the management of Gram-negative MDROs infections, especially in critically ill patients, have revived the clinical use of polymyxins and fosfomycin 1.
  • Ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam have recently been approved for the treatment of IAIs, including infection by ESBLs and P. aeruginosa, and may be valuable for treating infections caused by Gram-negative MDROs in order to preserve carbapenems 1.

Special Considerations

  • In patients with infections caused by metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam should be preferred, as recommended by recent guidelines 1.
  • Cefiderocol may also be considered as an alternative option for infections caused by MBL-producing CRE, with a conditional recommendation based on moderate certainty of evidence 1.

From the FDA Drug Label

Among Gram-negative uropathogens from both arms of Trial 2, genotypic testing identified certain ESBL groups (e.g., TEM-1, SHV-12, CTX-M-15, CTX-M-27, KPC-2, KPC-3, OXA-48) and AmpC beta-lactamases expected to be inhibited by avibactam in isolates from 273/281 (97. 2%) patients in the mMITT population. Bacteremia at baseline was present in 3. 6% of patients.

The treatment for ESBL blood culture is not directly addressed in the provided drug label. However, avibactam is expected to inhibit certain ESBL groups.

  • The drug label does mention bacteremia at baseline, but it does not provide specific treatment recommendations for ESBL blood culture.
  • Avibactam is used in combination with ceftazidime for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis 2. However, the provided information is not sufficient to draw a conclusion about the treatment of ESBL blood culture.

From the Research

ESBL Blood Culture Treatment

  • The treatment of bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) typically involves the use of carbapenems, such as meropenem and imipenem, as the antibiotics of choice 3.
  • However, due to the emergence of carbapenem resistance, alternative treatments are being considered, including cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combinations, such as piperacillin/tazobactam 3, 4.
  • Ertapenem is another carbapenem that can be used to treat ESBL-E infections, particularly in patients with less severe presentations, and is recommended to be used at high doses 3, 5.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis found that ertapenem was associated with a significantly lower 30-day mortality compared to other carbapenems, and had a similar clinical efficacy in terms of clinical cure or improvement and microbiological eradication 5.
  • Pharmacodynamic profiling of imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem against clinical isolates of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. found that all agents achieved high bactericidal cumulative fraction of response, although ertapenem was slightly less effective than imipenem and meropenem 6.

Treatment Options

  • Carbapenems, such as meropenem and imipenem, are recommended for the treatment of serious ESBL-E infections 3.
  • Alternative treatments, such as cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combinations, can be considered for patients with less severe presentations or for definitive treatment of patients with milder presentations 3, 4.
  • Ertapenem can be used to treat ESBL-E infections, particularly in patients with less severe presentations, and is recommended to be used at high doses 3, 5.
  • Other treatment options, such as piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, and cefiderocol, may also be considered, although their use should be guided by local susceptibility patterns and the severity of the infection 4, 7.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.