Are researchers required to maintain confidentiality even if a participant commits a crime?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The correct answer is B. FALSE, as researchers are not required to maintain confidentiality requirements when a participant commits a crime, according to the principles of ethical research conduct. While confidentiality is a fundamental ethical principle in research, there are important exceptions. Researchers typically have legal and ethical obligations to report certain crimes, particularly those involving harm or potential harm to the participant or others. These exceptions often include child abuse, elder abuse, threats of violence against identifiable individuals, and sometimes serious crimes. Most research protocols and informed consent documents explicitly state these limits to confidentiality, making participants aware that certain disclosures cannot remain confidential. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) generally require researchers to have clear protocols for handling such situations, balancing the need to protect research integrity with broader societal obligations to prevent harm. The specific reporting requirements vary by jurisdiction and the nature of the crime, but the general principle is that public safety concerns can override confidentiality protections in certain circumstances, as discussed in the context of research ethics 1.

Some studies, such as the Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials, provide guidance on identifying research participants and the ethical considerations involved in conducting research, including the importance of informed consent and the protection of participant confidentiality, unless certain exceptions apply 1. However, the provided evidence does not directly address the issue of confidentiality in the context of criminal activity, emphasizing the need to consider the broader ethical principles guiding research conduct.

In the context of research, confidentiality agreements are typically limited to a specific duration, such as five years or until the end of the study, whichever is longer, as discussed in the ACCF/AHA Consensus Conference Report on Professionalism and Ethics 1. Nevertheless, these agreements do not supersede the ethical and legal obligations of researchers to report crimes that pose a risk to participants or others.

Key considerations in research ethics include:

  • The protection of participant confidentiality, unless exceptions apply
  • The importance of informed consent in research participation
  • The ethical obligations of researchers to report crimes that pose a risk to participants or others
  • The role of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in overseeing research conduct and ensuring ethical standards are met.

Ultimately, researchers must balance the need to maintain confidentiality with the need to protect participants and others from harm, prioritizing the well-being and safety of individuals involved in research studies.

From the Research

Confidentiality Requirements in Research

  • Researchers are required to maintain confidentiality requirements, but there are exceptions to this rule, such as when a participant poses a risk to themselves or others.
  • However, the provided studies do not directly address the issue of confidentiality requirements in research when a participant commits a crime.
  • The studies focus on various topics, including the treatment of COPD 2, exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease 3, hypercorrection of high-confidence errors 4, the impact of vaccination on COVID-19 deaths 5, and the pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors 6.
  • None of these studies provide information on the confidentiality requirements in research when a participant commits a crime, so it is not possible to determine the correct answer based on the provided evidence.
  • Therefore, the correct answer to the question cannot be determined from the provided studies.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

People's hypercorrection of high-confidence errors: did they know it all along?

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2011

Research

The pathological diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors: common questions and tentative answers.

Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2011

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.