Is tranexamic acid (TXA) recommended as a first-line treatment for lower gastrointestinal (G.I.) bleeding?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 1, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Tranexamic acid (TXA) is not currently recommended as a first-line treatment for lower gastrointestinal (G.I.) bleeding. The most recent and highest quality study, published in 2019 in the journal Gut 1, suggests that the use of TXA in acute lower G.I. bleeding should be confined to clinical trials, pending the results of the HALT-IT trial. This guideline is based on the limited and inconsistent evidence for the routine use of TXA in lower G.I. bleeding, as well as concerns about potential adverse effects, including thrombotic complications.

Some key points to consider when managing lower G.I. bleeding include:

  • Hemodynamic stabilization with intravenous fluids or blood products as needed
  • Diagnostic procedures such as colonoscopy to identify and potentially treat the bleeding source
  • Targeted interventions based on the specific cause of the bleeding While TXA has established benefits in trauma-related bleeding and upper G.I. hemorrhage, its use in lower G.I. bleeding is not supported by strong evidence, and therefore, it should not be used as a first-line treatment. The focus should be on resuscitation, identifying the bleeding source, and providing targeted interventions based on the specific cause, rather than empiric TXA administration, as suggested by the British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines 1.

From the Research

Tranexamic Acid for Lower G.I. Bleeding

  • The use of tranexamic acid (TXA) for lower gastrointestinal (G.I.) bleeding is a topic of ongoing research and debate 2, 3, 4, 5.
  • A systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2025 found that TXA was associated with a significant increase in mortality in patients with lower G.I. bleeding (RR: 1.67,95% CI: 1.44-1.93) 3.
  • Another study published in 2022 found that extended-use high-dose IV TXA did not reduce mortality or bleeding outcomes and increased adverse events, including deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and seizure 4.
  • A 2021 systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials found that TXA significantly reduced the rates of continued bleeding, urgent endoscopic intervention, and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but the effects of TXA on lower gastrointestinal bleeding were not clear 5.
  • The clinical use of TXA is not without controversy, and its administration needs to be standardized to minimize adverse effects, such as seizures and other adverse events 6.

Key Findings

  • TXA may not be effective in reducing mortality or bleeding outcomes in patients with lower G.I. bleeding 3, 4.
  • The use of TXA in lower G.I. bleeding may be associated with an increased risk of adverse events, such as deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and seizure 4.
  • Further research is needed to determine the efficacy and safety of TXA in patients with lower G.I. bleeding 3, 4, 5.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

When to use tranexamic acid for the treatment of major bleeding?

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2024

Research

Tranexamic acid as treatment for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2025

Research

Clinical use of tranexamic acid: evidences and controversies.

Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.