What are the key considerations for documenting treatment decisions in a Multidisciplinary (MDM) note for patients with complex conditions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Effective documentation of treatment decisions in a Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (MDM) note for complex patients should prioritize therapies that address multiple chronic conditions simultaneously with high impact, as recommended by the American College of Cardiology 1. When documenting treatment decisions in an MDM note for patients with complex conditions, several key considerations must be taken into account to ensure comprehensive and patient-centered care.

  • The note should include a comprehensive summary of the patient's clinical presentation, relevant medical history, and current status.
  • It is essential to clearly state the consensus recommendation with specific treatment details, such as medication names, dosages, frequency, and duration, as seen in the example "Team recommends initiating therapy with an ACEI/ARB for hypertension, HF, and CKD" rather than simply stating "therapy recommended."
  • The clinical reasoning behind decisions should be documented, including which alternatives were considered and why they were rejected, to provide transparency and support clinical decision-making.
  • All participating specialists' input and any disagreements in opinion should be documented to ensure that all perspectives are considered and to facilitate communication among the healthcare team.
  • The anticipated benefits and risks discussed, including potential adverse effects and their management strategies, should be clearly outlined to inform patients and caregivers about what to expect and how to manage potential complications.
  • Follow-up plans with concrete timelines for reassessment and response evaluation should be specified to ensure continuity of care and to monitor the effectiveness of the treatment plan.
  • Patient preferences and values that influenced the decision-making process, especially for treatments with significant quality-of-life implications, should be included to respect patient autonomy and promote shared decision-making.
  • Any contingency plans for treatment failure or intolerance should be documented to prepare for potential outcomes and to ensure that alternative strategies are in place.

By prioritizing therapies that address multiple chronic conditions simultaneously and incorporating these elements into the MDM note, healthcare providers can ensure that patients with complex conditions receive comprehensive, patient-centered care that supports their unique needs and promotes optimal outcomes, as emphasized by recent guidelines 1.

From the Research

Key Considerations for Documenting Treatment Decisions in a Multidisciplinary (MDM) Note

  • The development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is crucial in assisting practitioners and patients in making informed healthcare decisions, as stated in 2.
  • CPGs should be developed based on the principles of bias minimization, systematic evidence retrieval and review, and a focus on patient-relevant outcomes, as mentioned in 2.
  • Medical decision making is a critical process that involves evaluating situations, considering various factors, and making informed choices, as discussed in 3.
  • In the context of complex conditions, such as heart failure and diabetes, it is essential to consider the clinical significance and epidemiology of the two-way association between these conditions, as highlighted in 4 and 5.
  • The treatment of type 2 diabetes and outcomes in patients with heart failure should be carefully considered, with metformin-based strategies and trial-proven anti-failure therapies showing benefits, as noted in 5 and 6.
  • When documenting treatment decisions in an MDM note, it is vital to consider the individual patient's needs, preferences, and values, as well as the latest evidence-based guidelines and research findings, such as those mentioned in 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Factors to Consider in Medical Decision Making

  • The degree of uncertainty about future events, as mentioned in 3.
  • The usefulness of outcomes in any particular case, as discussed in 3.
  • The importance of evaluating situations, considering various factors, and making informed choices, as highlighted in 3.
  • The need to consider the clinical significance and epidemiology of complex conditions, such as heart failure and diabetes, as noted in 4 and 5.

Best Practices for Documenting Treatment Decisions

  • Use a systematic and transparent approach to decision making, as recommended in 2.
  • Consider the latest evidence-based guidelines and research findings, such as those mentioned in 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.
  • Evaluate situations, consider various factors, and make informed choices, as discussed in 3.
  • Document treatment decisions clearly and concisely, taking into account the individual patient's needs, preferences, and values.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Evidence-Based Decision Making 4: Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021

Research

Medical Decision Making - an Overview.

Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH, 2022

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.