How are benign adnexal tumors that extend beyond clinical margins managed?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 2, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

Benign adnexal tumors that extend beyond clinical margins are typically managed conservatively with observation or partial removal, as the risk of malignancy is extremely low, ranging from 0.3% to 0.6% in average-risk women, as demonstrated by studies such as Gupta et al 1 and Parazzini et al 1. The management approach for benign adnexal tumors prioritizes minimizing unnecessary surgical interventions and their associated risks, given that the vast majority of these lesions are benign and can be accurately diagnosed using ultrasound (US) techniques, as outlined in the ACR Appropriateness Criteria 1. Key considerations in the management of these tumors include:

  • The risk of malignancy in benign-appearing lesions on US is less than 1%, with a recent study by Gupta et al 1 demonstrating a risk of 0.3% to 0.4% for malignancy and 0.2% to 0.4% for acute complications.
  • Unilocular cysts in premenopausal women have a very low risk of malignancy, with a meta-analysis by Parazzini et al 1 showing a risk of 0.6% in 987 surgically removed cysts.
  • Classic benign lesions, such as endometriomas, hemorrhagic cysts, and dermoids, have characteristic appearances on US and can be safely followed with yearly US, with a low risk of malignant transformation, as noted in studies such as Valentin et al 1. Therefore, the primary goal in managing benign adnexal tumors that extend beyond clinical margins is to balance the risk of local recurrence, functional preservation, and cosmetic outcomes, while minimizing unnecessary surgical interventions and their associated risks, as supported by the most recent and highest quality studies, including those published in the Journal of the American College of Radiology 1.

From the Research

Benign Adnexal Tumors Extending Beyond Clinical Margins

  • The management of benign adnexal tumors that extend beyond clinical margins is not directly addressed in the provided studies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • However, the studies discuss the management of adnexal masses in general, including benign and malignant tumors.
  • According to 3, adnexal masses are usually asymptomatic, but sometimes can be responsible for abdominal or pelvic pain, and treatment options consist of observational management or surgery.
  • The study 5 highlights the increasing sensitivity of ultrasound imaging in diagnosing rare malignant lesions, allowing for antenatal expectant management of benign asymptomatic adnexal masses until delivery or postpartum.
  • The First International Consensus Report on Adnexal Masses 6 recommends a more conservative approach to many benign adnexal masses and optimization of physician referral patterns to a gynecologic oncologist in cases of suspected ovarian malignancies.

Management of Benign Adnexal Tumors

  • The study 4 suggests that a two-step strategy using ultrasound-based benign simple descriptors and the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model can be used to estimate the risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors.
  • According to 2, in patients of reproductive age, detorsion with ovarian conservation is recommended, even in cases where the tissue appears necrotic, given poor intraoperative diagnostic rates of tissue death.
  • The study 6 concludes that patients would benefit from a more conservative approach to many benign adnexal masses and from optimization of physician referral patterns to a gynecologic oncologist in cases of suspected ovarian malignancies.

Surgical Management

  • The study 3 states that surgery can be offered as a primary tool when cancer is suspected or when acute complications such as ovarian torsion occur.
  • According to 5, laparoscopy can be safely performed in pregnancy for the antenatal removal of suspicious or symptomatic masses.
  • The study 2 emphasizes that the risk of ovarian damage/loss outweighs the risk of a diagnostic laparoscopy in patients of reproductive age.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Adnexal torsion: a review of diagnosis and management strategies.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2022

Research

Benign descriptors and ADNEX in two-step strategy to estimate risk of malignancy in ovarian tumors: retrospective validation in IOTA5 multicenter cohort.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023

Research

Management of the adnexal mass in pregnancy.

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2014

Research

First International Consensus Report on Adnexal Masses: Management Recommendations.

Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2017

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.