In a pediatric patient with a murmur, how can one differentiate an innocent (Still's) murmur from a murmur caused by a left-to-right shunt?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 8, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Differentiating Still's Murmur from Left-to-Right Shunt Murmurs in Pediatric Patients

Use the characteristic vibratory quality and positional changes of Still's murmur to distinguish it from shunt lesions: Still's murmur has a medium-pitched, vibratory ("musical" or "twanging string") character heard at the left lower sternal border that disappears or becomes quieter and localizes when the child sits upright, whereas left-to-right shunt murmurs are typically harsh, pansystolic or holosystolic, do not change significantly with position, and may be associated with other abnormal cardiac findings.

Key Distinguishing Features

Still's Murmur Characteristics 1

Acoustic Quality:

  • Medium-pitched with distinctive vibratory or musical character (often described as "twanging string" or "groaning")
  • This vibratory quality is the single most important distinguishing feature

Location:

  • Heard at apex, left lower sternal border, left middle sternal border, and right upper sternal border
  • Best heard at left lower sternal border

Positional Changes (Critical Differentiator):

  • Disappears or becomes quieter with upright position
  • Localizes to left lower sternal border when upright
  • This maneuver is essential for bedside diagnosis

Associated Findings:

  • No other abnormal cardiac findings
  • Normal S2 (not fixed split)
  • Grade 2 or less intensity typically
  • No radiation to back or neck

Left-to-Right Shunt Murmur Characteristics

Ventricular Septal Defect (VSD) - Most Common 2:

  • Harsh quality (not vibratory) 3
  • Pansystolic/holosystolic timing (odds ratio 54.0 for pathology) 3
  • Grade 3 or louder (odds ratio 4.84 for pathology) 3
  • Does NOT change with position
  • May have thrill
  • Can present even on day 1 of life 2

Atrial Septal Defect:

  • Fixed split S2 (pathognomonic finding) 4
  • Systolic ejection murmur at left upper sternal border
  • Does not change with position

Patent Ductus Arteriosus:

  • Continuous "machinery" murmur with systolic accentuation
  • Heard at left upper sternal border
  • Bounding pulses may be present

Clinical Algorithm for Differentiation

Step 1: Assess Murmur Quality

  • Vibratory/musical → Consider Still's murmur
  • Harsh → Suspect pathologic (VSD likely) 3
  • Blowing → Consider other innocent murmurs or regurgitant lesions

Step 2: Assess Timing

  • Midsystolic → Consistent with Still's or innocent pulmonary flow murmur
  • Pansystolic/holosystolic → Pathologic until proven otherwise (VSD, mitral regurgitation) 3
  • Continuous → PDA or venous hum (venous hum disappears with jugular compression)

Step 3: Perform Positional Maneuver

  • Have child sit or stand upright
  • Still's murmur: Disappears, becomes quieter, or localizes to LLSB 1
  • Shunt murmurs: No significant change

Step 4: Assess Second Heart Sound

  • Normal, physiologically split S2 → Consistent with Still's
  • Fixed split S2 → ASD until proven otherwise 4
  • Abnormal S2 → Odds ratio 4.09 for pathology 3

Step 5: Check for Additional Findings

Red flags indicating pathologic murmur requiring echocardiography 5, 6:

  • Grade 3 or louder intensity
  • Diastolic component
  • Holosystolic timing
  • Radiation to back or neck
  • Abnormal pulses
  • Clicks
  • Symptoms (failure to thrive, respiratory distress, exercise intolerance)
  • Abnormal ECG or chest X-ray

Age-Specific Considerations

Neonates (0-5 days):

  • 86% of murmurs in neonates are pathologic 2
  • VSD is most common (37%), followed by PDA (23%) 2
  • Left-to-right shunts present earlier than traditionally believed 2
  • All neonatal murmurs warrant echocardiography - referral to pediatric cardiology preferred over ordering echo yourself 6
  • Pulse oximetry screening mandatory regardless of murmur presence 6

Infants and Older Children:

  • Still's murmur typically appears ages 2-7 years
  • Most common innocent murmur in this age group 7, 8
  • Clinical assessment by experienced observer sufficient if clearly innocent 9

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Assuming all vibratory murmurs are innocent: Always perform positional maneuver and assess for associated findings

  2. Missing early VSD presentation: VSDs can cause audible murmurs from day 1 of life as pulmonary vascular resistance drops 2

  3. Relying on intensity alone: Small VSDs (maladie de Roger) can be very loud but hemodynamically insignificant, while large defects may have softer murmurs

  4. Overlooking fixed split S2: This finding has high specificity for ASD and should prompt immediate referral 4

  5. Ordering unnecessary tests for clearly innocent murmurs: ECG and chest X-ray should not be reflexively performed for grade 2 or softer midsystolic murmurs identified as innocent by experienced observer 5, 6

When to Refer for Echocardiography

Mandatory referral 5, 6:

  • Any diastolic murmur
  • Holosystolic/pansystolic murmur
  • Grade 3 or louder murmur
  • Murmur radiating to back or neck
  • Associated clicks
  • Abnormal S2 (fixed split, single, or paradoxical)
  • Any symptoms or signs of cardiac disease
  • All neonatal murmurs
  • Diagnostic uncertainty

Clinical diagnosis sufficient (no echo needed) 9, 5:

  • Grade 2 or softer midsystolic murmur
  • Vibratory quality
  • Disappears or localizes with upright position
  • Normal S2
  • No other abnormal findings
  • Identified as innocent by experienced observer
  • Asymptomatic child

Note: While experienced pediatric cardiologists can distinguish innocent from pathologic murmurs with 92-97% sensitivity and 94-98% specificity 3, recent evidence suggests that even with high clinical confidence, echocardiography may occasionally identify clinically silent but prognostically important abnormalities 10. However, this must be balanced against cost-effectiveness and the expectations of referring physicians and families.

References

Research

Cardinal clinical signs in the differentiation of heart murmurs in children.

Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine, 1996

Research

Heart Murmurs in Children: Evaluation and Management.

American family physician, 2022

Research

Automated Identification of Innocent Still's Murmur in Children.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2017

Related Questions

In a 9‑day‑old neonate with a harsh holosystolic murmur heard at the upper left and right sternal borders, radiating to the apex and both axillae, and with feeding difficulty and fatigue, what is the most likely diagnosis?
What is the description of Still's murmur?
Does a grade 1/6 systolic murmur in a 12-year-old female require further workup?
What is the best initial test to evaluate a 2‑week‑old neonate with weight loss and a harsh holosystolic murmur at the left lower sternal border?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management for an asymptomatic 12-year-old with an incidentally discovered heart murmur?
What are concise recommendations for psychotropic agents that treat both anxiety and migraine, including dosing regimens, monitoring guidelines, and major adverse effects?
What alternative antibiotic regimens can be used instead of augmentin for a female patient with acute cystitis and acute bacterial sinusitis, considering sulfa allergy and local resistance patterns?
A patient on metformin hydrochloride immediate‑release 1000 mg daily develops diarrhea; should the dose be switched to metformin hydrochloride extended‑release 500 mg, and what is the recommended medication adjustment?
Where should botulinum toxin be injected in the posterior tibialis muscle?
What is the appropriate evaluation and management for a patient with neurologically mediated vomiting?
In a 71-year-old woman with persistent urinary symptoms despite a 5-day course of empiric antibiotics and a negative urine culture, what are the appropriate next steps in evaluation and management?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.