Is a visual acuity of 20/70 worse than 20/40?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 13, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Yes, 20/70 vision is worse than 20/40 vision.

A visual acuity of 20/70 represents more severe visual impairment than 20/40, meaning the person must be at 20 feet to see what someone with normal vision can see at 70 feet, compared to 40 feet for 20/40 vision.

Understanding the Visual Acuity Scale

The Snellen visual acuity notation works as a fraction where:

  • The first number (always 20 in standard testing) = the testing distance in feet
  • The second number = the distance at which a person with normal vision could read the same line

The larger the bottom number, the worse the vision. Therefore:

  • 20/40 means moderate visual impairment
  • 20/70 means more severe visual impairment
  • 20/200 or worse defines legal blindness

Clinical Significance of These Thresholds

According to the USPSTF guidelines, visual acuity worse than 20/40 defines the threshold for visual impairment 1. This classification is clinically meaningful because:

  • 20/40 is the cutoff for unrestricted driver's licenses in many states 1
  • Visual impairment (defined as worse than 20/40 but better than 20/200) affects approximately 2.91 million Americans aged 60+ 1
  • Impaired visual acuity is consistently associated with decreased quality of life, reduced ability to perform activities of daily living, inability to drive safely, and increased risk of falls and injuries 1

Practical Implications

Since 20/70 falls within the "impaired visual acuity" range (worse than 20/40 but better than 20/200), a person with 20/70 vision would likely:

  • Not qualify for an unrestricted driver's license in most jurisdictions
  • Experience more difficulty with daily activities than someone with 20/40 vision
  • Have higher mortality risk, particularly from non-cardiovascular, non-cancer causes 2

The progression from 20/40 to 20/70 represents clinically meaningful deterioration that warrants ophthalmologic evaluation to identify and treat correctable causes such as refractive errors, cataracts, or macular degeneration 1.

Related Questions

What is the appropriate treatment and dosage for an 11‑month‑old infant presenting with fever and headache?
How should I conduct a 12‑month‑old well‑child visit, including the assessment components and questions to ask?
What management is recommended for a blood pressure of 135/83 mm Hg?
Is a blood pressure of 96/59 mm Hg normal for a 14‑year‑old adolescent?
What is the most likely diagnosis in a 58-year-old woman presenting with vulvar pruritus and thin, atrophic, whitish vulvar skin?
How should I manage a 65-year-old patient with bilateral leg pain, a history of methamphetamine use in remission, L5 lumbosacral radiculopathy, hepatitis C, multiple arthralgias, chronic low back pain with right-sided sciatica, negative right lower extremity venous duplex and arterial duplex showing no significant arterial insufficiency, who requests a hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Norco) 10 mg/325 mg refill and is currently taking amitriptyline?
Should a patient with interstitial fibrosis on chest CT be evaluated promptly or can follow‑up be delayed up to 30 days?
What is the appropriate ICD‑10‑CM code for an umbilical mass?
What is the differential diagnosis and recommended work‑up for a male patient with an RBC count of 4.12 ×10^12/L, mean corpuscular volume of 106.8 fL, mean corpuscular hemoglobin of 33.7 pg, normal hemoglobin and hematocrit, and an absolute lymphocyte count of 803/µL?
What is the best treatment for an obese man with groin intertrigo?
For a severe skin infection, is cefalexin (Keflex) 500 mg orally four times daily appropriate?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.