Treatment of Loosened Acetabular Cup After Total Hip Arthroplasty
A loosened acetabular cup after total hip arthroplasty requires revision surgery with the specific approach determined by the extent of bone defect, cup stability, and infection status—with two-stage exchange for infected cases and single-stage revision with impaction bone grafting or cementless reconstruction for aseptic loosening.
Initial Diagnostic Workup
Before determining treatment, you must definitively rule out infection, as this fundamentally changes management:
- Obtain joint aspiration with culture and cell count analysis
- If infection is suspected but aspiration is negative, consider In-111-labeled leukocyte/Tc-99m-labeled sulfur colloid marrow scanning (96% sensitivity, 87% specificity for periprosthetic infection) 1
- Never treat based on superficial wound swabs alone—these are misleading and promote unnecessarily broad antimicrobial treatment 2
Treatment Algorithm Based on Infection Status
If Infection is Present (Septic Loosening)
Perform two-stage exchange revision 2:
- First stage: Remove prosthesis, thorough debridement, insert antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer
- Administer 6 weeks of pathogen-specific intravenous antibiotics
- Second stage: Re-implant new prosthesis after infection clearance (typically 6+ weeks later)
Critical pitfall: Do not attempt debridement with implant retention (DAIR) for a loosened cup—this is reserved only for acute infections with stable, well-fixed components 2.
If Infection is Excluded (Aseptic Loosening)
Your surgical approach depends on the severity of acetabular bone defect (use AAOS classification):
For Paprosky Type 3A Defects (Contained or Medial Defects)
Use impaction bone grafting with cemented cup 3, 4:
- Morsellized cancellous bone allograft compacted into defect
- Medial metallic mesh if needed for medial wall deficiency
- Cemented polyethylene cup
- Survival rate: 83% at 15 years 4
- This approach successfully restores hip center of rotation in 66% mediolaterally 3
For Paprosky Type 3B Defects (Lateral/Rim Segmental Defects)
Avoid lateral mesh—use alternative reconstruction 4:
- Do not use lateral metallic mesh (hazard ratio 2.942 for loosening, only 54% survival at 15 years with bilateral mesh) 4
- Consider cementless hemispherical cup with superior augments
- May require structural allograft or custom triflange components for severe cases
- Survival rate with appropriate technique: 73% at 15 years 4
For Stable, Well-Positioned Cups with Isolated Osteolysis
Consider isolated liner exchange 5:
- Only if cup demonstrates intraoperative stability
- Patient must be asymptomatic
- No progressive osteolysis in weight-bearing areas
- No implant defects or massive polyethylene wear
- Can fill osteolytic lesions through screw holes, though long-term benefit remains unclear 5
Surgical Technique Considerations
For impaction grafting reconstructions 3, 6:
- Transform segmental defects into cavitary defects through graft compaction
- Achieve primary cup stability through press-fit
- Restore anatomic hip center of rotation
- Use shaped metallic mesh for uncontained defects (medial only)
- Allow early weight-bearing—the stress promotes faster graft incorporation 6
For severe bone loss requiring double-cup technique 7:
- Outer trabecular metal cup fills defect
- Inner cup provides bearing surface
- Good press-fit eliminates need for screw fixation
- Restores anatomic rotation center
Monitoring vs. Intervention Decision Points
Proceed with revision surgery if any of the following 5:
- Radiographic cup loosening or migration
- Cup malposition
- Osteolysis in weight-bearing areas
- Imminent or present periprosthetic fracture
- Rapid progressive osteolysis
- Implant defects or massive liner wear
- Symptomatic patient with progressive pain
Continue monitoring if 5:
- Cup well-fixed and well-positioned
- Asymptomatic patient
- Stable, non-progressive osteolysis
- No implant defects
- No high-grade polyethylene wear
- No infection signs
Key Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid
Never attempt antimicrobial therapy alone without surgery for a loose cup—this has higher failure rates and is only for patients who cannot tolerate surgery 2
Do not use lateral metallic mesh for rim defects—this nearly triples the risk of re-loosening 4
Do not rely on plain radiographs alone for early loosening—consider dynamic radiography to detect gross cup mobility when standard imaging is inconclusive 8
Do not perform isolated liner exchange without confirming intraoperative cup stability—preoperative imaging can be misleading 5
Avoid one-stage exchange in chronic infections—two-stage procedures have superior infection eradication rates 2