Did the Polish rectal cancer trial publish pathologic complete response (pCR) results?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: September 19, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Did the Polish Rectal Cancer Trial Publish pCR Results?

Yes, the Polish II rectal cancer trial (POLISH II) published pathologic complete response (pCR) results. 1

Study Details

The POLISH II trial was a phase III randomized controlled trial conducted in Poland that compared:

  • Standard arm: 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation (5FUCRT) or FOLFOX with chemoradiation → surgery (n=254)
  • Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) arm: Short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) → FOLFOX4 (3 cycles) → surgery (n=261)

The trial enrolled patients with primary or locally recurrent cT4 or palpable fixed cT3 rectal cancer, with 56% having tumors ≤5 cm from the anal verge. 1

pCR Findings in Context

The POLISH II trial was included in a meta-analysis of four major TNT trials that demonstrated significantly improved pCR rates with TNT compared to standard chemoradiation (OR 1.74,95% CI 1.45-2.10). 1 This meta-analysis encompassed RAPIDO, POLISH II, PRODIGE-23, and STELLAR trials.

Important Caveats About pCR as an Endpoint

While the POLISH II trial reported pCR data, recent evidence questions the reliability of pCR as a surrogate for survival outcomes:

  • A 2025 meta-analysis of 25 RCTs (11,882 patients) found no trial-level correlation between pCR and overall survival (β=0.37, P=0.57) or disease-free survival (β=-0.84, P=0.32) 2
  • The route to achieving pCR matters—patients achieving pCR after TNT had worse overall survival than those achieving pCR after chemoradiation alone, suggesting pCR does not uniformly predict favorable prognosis 3

This disconnect between improved pCR rates and survival outcomes represents a critical limitation in using pCR as a primary endpoint for rectal cancer trials.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.