APRV Settings in ARDS: A Practical Guide
While major ARDS guidelines do not provide specific recommendations for APRV settings, the mode can be used as a rescue strategy for refractory hypoxemia when conventional lung-protective ventilation fails, with settings based on the "open lung" approach.
Critical Context
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign 1 and American Thoracic Society guidelines 2 do not include APRV in their recommendations. These guidelines strongly recommend conventional lung-protective ventilation with tidal volumes of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight and plateau pressures ≤30 cmH2O 1. APRV is notably absent from guideline-level evidence, positioning it as an alternative or rescue mode rather than first-line therapy.
When to Consider APRV
APRV is typically reserved for:
- Severe ARDS with refractory hypoxemia despite optimized conventional ventilation
- Failure of standard lung-protective strategies including higher PEEP, recruitment maneuvers, and prone positioning 1, 3
- PaO2/FiO2 ratios <150 mmHg that persist despite guideline-recommended interventions
Important caveat: Before initiating APRV, ensure you have exhausted guideline-supported interventions including prone positioning (strong recommendation for PaO2/FiO2 <150) 1 and consider neuromuscular blockade for 48 hours 1.
APRV Parameter Settings
Based on available evidence 4, 5, 6, here is a practical approach:
Initial Settings:
P-high (High Pressure):
- Set equal to the plateau pressure from conventional ventilation (typically 25-30 cmH2O)
- Maximum should not exceed 30-35 cmH2O to maintain lung protection 4
- This maintains alveolar recruitment throughout most of the respiratory cycle
T-high (Time at High Pressure):
- Set between 4-6 seconds 4
- This prolonged inflation time promotes alveolar recruitment and oxygenation
- Allows unrestricted spontaneous breathing at the higher pressure level
P-low (Low Pressure):
- Set at 0 cmH2O 4
- This brief release allows CO2 elimination
- The rapid drop creates the "release" phase
T-low (Release Time):
- Set at 0.4-0.8 seconds 4, 5
- Critical parameter: terminate release when expiratory flow decreases to 50-75% of peak expiratory flow
- This prevents complete alveolar collapse and maintains recruitment
- Monitor the expiratory flow waveform closely
Tidal Volume During Release:
- Maximum allowed: 4-6 mL/kg predicted body weight 4
- Measure the volume delivered during the release phase
- If exceeding 6 mL/kg, increase P-low or decrease T-low
Monitoring and Adjustment
Oxygenation optimization:
- Adjust P-high and T-high to improve oxygenation
- Increasing P-high recruits more alveoli but risks barotrauma
- Increasing T-high prolongs recruitment time
Ventilation optimization:
- Adjust release frequency (by changing T-high) to manage CO2
- Ensure adequate release volumes without excessive stretch
Hemodynamic monitoring:
- High mean airway pressures can impair venous return
- Monitor for hypotension and adjust vasopressor support as needed
- Consider reducing P-high if hemodynamic compromise occurs
Weaning from APRV
When patient improves (FiO2 ≤0.4, improving compliance):
- Gradually reduce P-high to reach target of 10 cmH2O 4
- Gradually increase T-high to reach target of 10 seconds 4
- Transition criteria to CPAP: FiO2 ≤0.4, P-high ≤10 cmH2O, T-high ≥10 seconds 4
- Then follow standard weaning protocols per guidelines 1
Critical Pitfalls and Barriers
Major barriers to APRV use 4, 7:
- Lack of standardized protocols (most common barrier - 77.9% of clinicians)
- Insufficient training and education
- Significant practice variability between centers
- No mortality benefit proven in randomized trials
Safety concerns:
- Risk of volutrauma if release volumes exceed lung-protective limits 5
- Potential for increased work of breathing
- Requires continuous monitoring of spontaneous breathing effort
- Avoid in patients with high intracranial pressure or severe hemodynamic instability
Evidence Quality Assessment
The evidence for APRV is weak and inconsistent 8, 5, 9. One retrospective study showed improved oxygenation and trend toward lower mortality 6, but this lacks the rigor of randomized controlled trials. The 2017 expert opinion on ARDS respiratory support 3 does not recommend APRV as a standard intervention. Recent surveys reveal substantial knowledge gaps and practice variability among clinicians 4, 7.
Given the absence of guideline support and limited evidence, APRV should only be used by experienced clinicians in centers with established protocols, and only after conventional lung-protective strategies have failed. The priority remains adherence to proven interventions: low tidal volumes, plateau pressure limits, higher PEEP for moderate-severe ARDS, and prone positioning for severe cases 1, 2.