No, SPSS and TIPS are fundamentally different entities
A spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) is a naturally occurring collateral vessel that develops in cirrhosis, while a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an artificially created stent-shunt placed via interventional radiology. These are completely distinct anatomical and clinical entities, though they can interact in important ways.
Key Differences
SPSS (Spontaneous Portosystemic Shunt)
- Naturally occurring collateral vessels that develop as a consequence of portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients
- Form spontaneously as the body attempts to decompress the portal system
- Most commonly gastro-renal shunts (78.89% of cases) 1
- Present in over 60% of cirrhotic patients on contrast-enhanced CT 2
- Represent radiological biomarkers of clinically significant portal hypertension 2
TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt)
- Artificially created by interventional radiologists
- Involves placing a metal stent inside the liver via the jugular vein in the neck 3
- Performed under general anesthesia or deep sedation, taking 90-120 minutes 3
- Created specifically to treat complications of portal hypertension (variceal bleeding, refractory ascites) 3
Clinical Interaction Between SPSS and TIPS
The relationship between these two entities is clinically significant:
SPSS Behavior After TIPS Creation
When TIPS is placed, SPSS area typically decreases significantly (median reduction from 67.2 to 15.7 mm², p<0.001), while total shunt area (TIPS + SPSS) remains unchanged 4. The relative decrease in SPSS area after TIPS is an independent protective factor for mortality (HR: 0.19, p=0.034) 4.
Management Considerations
For large SPSS (>6mm) at time of TIPS placement:
- Embolization of SPSS may be considered during elective TIPS for ascites/hepatic hydrothorax to reduce post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy risk 5
- TIPS combined with concurrent SPSS embolization in patients with large SPSS achieves better 2-year transplant-free survival (84.38% vs 71.28%, p=0.045) and lower hepatic encephalopathy rates (29.69% vs 53.33%, p=0.001) compared to TIPS alone 6
For refractory hepatic encephalopathy from large SPSS:
- In select patients with large SPSS (>6mm) and refractory hepatic encephalopathy, shunt embolization should be considered 5
- SPSS embolization achieves 83.1% hepatic encephalopathy remission rate with 99.8% procedural success 7
- If portal hypertensive complications develop after SPSS embolization, small caliber TIPS creation can be considered 5
Clinical Significance of SPSS Size
Larger SPSS diameter correlates with:
- Higher MELD scores, INR, and total bilirubin 1
- Lower rebleeding risk (3.38% in large SPSS vs 14.64-16.88% in smaller SPSS, representing 77% reduction in rebleeding risk) 1
- Worse baseline liver function but paradoxically better bleeding outcomes 1
Common Pitfall
Do not confuse these entities or use the terms interchangeably. SPSS represents the body's natural response to portal hypertension, while TIPS is a therapeutic intervention. However, recognize that they interact clinically—large SPSS may need to be addressed (embolized) at the time of TIPS placement to optimize outcomes, particularly for hepatic encephalopathy prevention.