Key Pathological Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Candidacy
The most critical pathological biomarkers that determine immunotherapy eligibility are microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) status, PD-L1 expression, and tumor mutational burden (TMB), with MSI-H/dMMR representing the strongest pan-cancer predictor of immunotherapy response 1.
Primary Testing Algorithm
First-Tier Biomarkers (Essential for All Candidates)
MSI-H/dMMR Status is the most robust predictor across cancer types and should be assessed first:
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) is the recommended initial test 1
- Loss of expression of any of these proteins indicates dMMR status
- PCR-based testing using five microsatellite markers (including BAT-25 and BAT-26) serves as the second-line method 1
- MSI-H/dMMR status predicts response regardless of tumor type, making it the only FDA-approved tissue-agnostic biomarker for immunotherapy
PD-L1 Expression via immunohistochemistry:
- Combined Positive Score (CPS) is the preferred metric for most solid tumors 2, 3
- Critical caveat: PD-L1 expression shows spatial and temporal heterogeneity, and thresholds vary by tumor type and specific immunotherapy agent 2
- Despite limitations, remains essential for patient selection in lung cancer, gastric cancer, and other malignancies 4
Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB):
- High TMB (typically ≥10 mutations/megabase, though thresholds vary) correlates with increased neoantigen load 3, 4
- Next-generation sequencing (NGS) coupling MSI and TMB analysis represents the optimal approach for comprehensive assessment 1
- Important limitation: significant overlap exists between TMB-high and MSI-H biology 2
Second-Tier Biomarkers (Tumor-Specific Enhancement)
Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs):
- High TIL density, particularly CD8+ T cells, indicates an inflamed tumor microenvironment favorable for immunotherapy response 5, 4
- Tertiary lymphoid structures within tumors further enhance predictive value 5
Specific Genetic Alterations:
- Favorable: EBV-associated tumors in gastric cancer 2
- Unfavorable: KEAP1, STK11, SMARCA4 mutations predict resistance in lung cancer 6
- Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation correlates with immune exclusion and poor response 5
Blood-Based Biomarkers (Emerging Clinical Utility)
Systemic Inflammatory Markers 3:
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) or systemic immune-inflammation index
- Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)
- Serum albumin
These provide prognostic information and should be obtained as baseline measurements.
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Assay Variability: Different PD-L1 companion diagnostics use different antibodies and scoring systems—ensure the appropriate assay for the specific immunotherapy agent being considered 2, 4
Temporal Heterogeneity: PD-L1 expression can change with prior treatment; use the most recent biopsy when possible 2
Single Biomarker Reliance: No single biomarker perfectly predicts response; MSI-H/dMMR has the strongest evidence but combining biomarkers improves patient selection 1, 3
Tissue Adequacy: Ensure sufficient tumor tissue for comprehensive testing—NGS panels can simultaneously assess MSI, TMB, and actionable mutations 1
Practical Implementation Framework
For any patient being considered for immunotherapy:
Mandatory testing: MSI/dMMR status (IHC first-line), PD-L1 expression, baseline inflammatory markers 1, 3
Strongly recommended: TMB via NGS if resources permit, particularly for tumors outside Lynch syndrome spectrum 1
Tumor-specific additions:
Consider in research settings: Circulating tumor DNA dynamics, microbiome analysis, AI-assisted multimodal prediction models 2, 6
The strongest candidates for immunotherapy demonstrate MSI-H/dMMR status OR high PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥10 in most contexts) OR high TMB, with the best outcomes when multiple favorable biomarkers align 1, 3.