Ulnar-Sided Wrist Pain: Evaluation and Management
For ulnar-sided wrist pain with normal or nonspecific radiographs, obtain MRI without IV contrast as the next imaging study, which is highly accurate for diagnosing TFCC tears (the most common cause) and other soft tissue pathologies. 1
Initial Evaluation
Start with standard wrist radiographs (posteroanterior, lateral, and oblique views). Measure ulnar variance on both standard and gripping PA views—ulnar variance typically increases from approximately 1 mm to 2.7 mm with gripping in pathologic conditions 2. Look specifically for:
- Ulnar variance measurements
- Signs of ulnar impaction syndrome
- Distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) abnormalities
- Carpal alignment issues
Clinical Assessment Framework
Use the "storey concept" with the ulnar styloid as your reference point 3:
- Lower storey: DRUJ pathology
- Intermediate storey: Radiocarpal joint issues (TFCC tears)
- Upper storey: Midcarpal and carpometacarpal pathology
Determine if the wrist is stable or unstable, with or without arthritis, as this guides DRUJ pain management 3.
Advanced Imaging Algorithm
First-Line: MRI Without IV Contrast
MRI without contrast is the appropriate next step after radiographs 1. The evidence shows:
- High accuracy for TFCC tears involving the radial (central) disc zone, especially with high-resolution fast spin-echo or 3D gradient-recalled sequences 1
- 3.0T MRI performs better than 1.5T for TFCC lesions, though direct comparison studies are lacking 1
- Sensitivity ranges from 63-100% for TFCC tears at 3.0T 4
- Fair sensitivity for peripheral TFCC attachments and ulnar disc attachments with non-contrast MRI 1
Important caveat: IV contrast adds minimal benefit for ulnar-sided pain unless you're specifically evaluating for infection or inflammatory arthritis 1, 4.
When to Consider MR Arthrography
Direct MR arthrography may be appropriate if non-contrast MRI is equivocal or when you need higher sensitivity for:
- Complete and incomplete lunotriquetral ligament tears (sensitivity 82%, specificity 86% with midcarpal injection) 2
- Peripheral TFCC attachments 1
- Precise determination of which ligament segments are torn 1
The radiocarpal injection has 90% sensitivity and 98% specificity for TFCC tears 2. Consider adding DRUJ injection if ulnar-sided TFCC detachment is suspected 4.
Alternative: CT Arthrography
CT arthrography may be appropriate when 1:
- MRI is contraindicated
- Metallic implants create excessive MRI artifact
- You need superior accuracy for articular cartilage defects
CT arthrography has accuracy superior to MRI and similar to MR arthrography for TFCC and intrinsic ligament lesions 1. However, it's less sensitive for extra-articular findings like extensor carpi ulnaris tendon abnormalities that cause ulnar-sided pain 1.
What NOT to Order
- CT without contrast: Not routinely used 1
- Bone scan: Not routinely used for chronic ulnar-sided pain 1, though it has 80% sensitivity for ulnar impaction syndrome when combined with radiographic findings 2
- Conventional arthrography alone: Largely supplanted by cross-sectional imaging; has only moderate accuracy (76% pooled sensitivity) for TFCC perforations 1
- Ultrasound: Limited role; may help stage infections or guide aspirations but not for primary TFCC/ligament evaluation 1
Common Diagnostic Pitfalls
- Don't rely solely on physical examination: The ulnocarpal tenderness test has only 72% sensitivity and 33% specificity 2
- Measure ulnar variance correctly: Always obtain gripping PA views, not just standard views 2
- Consider mechanism of injury: Acute onset after loaded dorsiflexion mechanism strongly suggests lunotriquetral ligament and/or TFCC tear 2
- Don't assume all ulnar pain is TFCC: Multiple overlapping pathologies exist in this region 5, 3
Management Principles
Once diagnosis is established through imaging:
- TFCC tears may require arthroscopic evaluation and treatment
- Lunotriquetral ligament tears benefit from combined midcarpal and radiocarpal arthrography for surgical planning 2
- Ulnar impaction syndrome requires assessment of ulnar variance and consideration of ulnar shortening procedures
- Refer to hand surgery when advanced imaging confirms pathology requiring intervention or when diagnosis remains unclear despite appropriate imaging