Which has a better prognosis, Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) positive or negative breast cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

HER2-positive breast cancer has a comparable or sometimes better prognosis than HER2-negative breast cancer when treated with current targeted therapies. Historically, HER2-positive tumors have been associated with faster growth rates, higher recurrence rates, increased likelihood of metastasis, and poorer overall survival 1. However, the introduction of HER2-targeted therapies has significantly improved outcomes in patients with HER2-positive early and metastatic breast cancer, narrowing the prognostic difference between HER2-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer 1.

Some key points to consider when evaluating the prognosis of HER2-positive versus HER2-negative breast cancer include:

  • The development of targeted therapies like trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and T-DM1, which have improved survival rates for HER2-positive patients 1
  • The importance of considering factors beyond HER2 status, such as tumor size, grade, lymph node involvement, hormone receptor status, and the patient's overall health and age 1
  • The increased incidence of brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer due to improved systemic therapy and longer patient survival 1

According to the most recent and highest quality study, the 12-year overall survival rate for HER2-positive early breast cancer was 79% with adjuvant trastuzumab, compared to 73% without trastuzumab 1. Additionally, the 8-year overall survival rate for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer was 37% with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel, compared to 23% with trastuzumab and docetaxel 1. These findings suggest that HER2-positive breast cancer can have a comparable or sometimes better prognosis than HER2-negative breast cancer when treated with current targeted therapies.

From the Research

Prognosis of HER2-Positive and Negative Breast Cancer

  • The prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer has improved significantly with the introduction of HER2-targeted therapies 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • Studies have shown that HER2-positive breast cancer is no longer a marker of poor prognosis if access to HER2-targeted therapies is granted 2.
  • In fact, the overall survival of HER2-positive breast cancer patients has approached that of luminal subtype breast cancer patients with the use of HER2-targeted therapies 2.
  • However, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who are PAM50-HER2-enriched may have a lower overall survival compared to HER2-positive patients who receive HER2-targeted therapies 2.
  • The treatment landscape of HER2-positive breast cancer is constantly evolving, with several novel therapies being investigated and showing promising results 4, 5, 6.

Comparison of Prognosis

  • Before the introduction of HER2-targeted therapies, HER2-positive breast cancer had a significantly worse prognosis compared to HER2-negative breast cancer 2.
  • However, with the use of HER2-targeted therapies, the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer has improved dramatically, and it is no longer considered a marker of poor prognosis 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • In contrast, HER2-negative breast cancer patients who are PAM50-HER2-enriched may have a poorer prognosis compared to HER2-positive patients who receive HER2-targeted therapies 2.

Current Treatment Options

  • The current standard treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer includes HER2-targeted therapies such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • The treatment options for HER2-negative breast cancer depend on various factors, including the hormone receptor status and the presence of other molecular markers 2, 4, 5, 6.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.