What is a Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence (MARS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 1, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

What is MARS MRI?

MARS MRI (Metal Artifact Reduction Sequence MRI) is a specialized MRI technique that uses modified imaging parameters—primarily view angle tilting combined with increased gradient strength and high bandwidth—to significantly reduce the size and intensity of metal-induced artifacts, enabling visualization of soft tissues and bone structures adjacent to metallic implants. 1

Technical Mechanism

MARS-MRI works by addressing the fundamental problem of susceptibility artifacts that metal hardware creates on conventional MRI sequences. The technique employs:

  • View angle tilting (VAT) combined with increased gradient strength as the core mechanism 2
  • High bandwidth optimization (typically ≥400 Hz/pixel achieves >90% of artifact reduction) 3
  • Increased matrix size (256×256 or greater captures most benefit) 3
  • Can be applied to any spin-echo sequence without requiring additional imaging time 2

More advanced MARS techniques include multispectral imaging methods like MAVRIC (multiacquisition variable-resonance image combination) and SEMAC (slice-encoding for metal artifact correction), though these come at the expense of signal-to-noise ratio and longer acquisition times 4.

Clinical Applications

Hip Arthroplasty

MARS-MRI enables assessment of soft tissues around prosthetic hips including the pseudocapsule, tendons, and neurovascular structures 1. This is particularly critical for:

  • Detecting adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) and pseudotumors in metal-on-metal prostheses, with sensitivity ranging from 71-93.9% and specificity 42.9-87% 1
  • Evaluating muscle atrophy (sensitivity 81%, specificity 37% compared to CT) 1
  • Diagnosing avascular necrosis in patients with persistent pain after femoral neck fracture with hip screws 2
  • Assessing periprosthetic infection, where infected synovium shows a characteristic hyperintense laminar appearance distinct from particle disease 5

Important caveat: Studies performed >1 year before revision surgery show markedly reduced sensitivity (29%) and should not be used for clinical decision-making or surgical planning 1.

Knee Arthroplasty

MARS-MRI allows visualization of structures adjacent to metal staples, pins, screws, and even total knee replacements 2. For periprosthetic infection diagnosis:

  • Infected joints show lamellated hyperintense synovitis (sensitivity 86-92%, specificity 85-87%) 5
  • This appearance differs from the frond-like hypertrophied synovium of particle-induced synovitis 5
  • Can detect osteolysis not visible on radiographs 5

Other Applications

  • Spinal fixation hardware evaluation (allows visualization of vertebral bodies and spinal canal) 2
  • Post-tumor resection reconstruction assessment 2
  • Wrist fusion or scaphoid screw fixation 2

Diagnostic Performance

Recent meta-analysis data (2026) demonstrates excellent overall diagnostic accuracy for periprosthetic joint infection 6:

  • Pooled sensitivity: 0.88 (95% CI 0.72-0.95)
  • Pooled specificity: 0.95 (95% CI 0.80-0.99)
  • AUC: 0.94

Soft tissue changes show the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.91), while bone changes are less accurate 6.

Limitations

  • Signal-to-noise ratio reduction when using high bandwidth and advanced techniques 4, 3
  • Reduced sensitivity for osteolysis compared to CT (sensitivity 27%, specificity 1%) 1
  • Less effective for bone changes compared to soft tissue evaluation 6
  • Combining MARS-MRI with ultrasound improves accuracy, as some lesions visible on one modality may not appear on the other 1

Practical Considerations

The trade-off between bandwidth increase (which reduces SNR but maintains reasonable acquisition time) versus matrix increase (which lengthens scan time linearly) favors using higher bandwidth as the primary tool for artifact reduction 3. Image quality remains satisfactory even with highest bandwidth settings despite the SNR loss 3.

References

Guideline

acr appropriateness criteria® imaging after total hip arthroplasty.

Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2023

Research

Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 2000

Research

Advances in MRI around metal.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2017

Guideline

acr appropriateness criteria® imaging after total knee arthroplasty: 2023 update.

Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2023

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.