Esophageal Diversion Tubes Are NOT Used Alongside Endotracheal Tubes
The term "diversion tube" in your question appears to be a misunderstanding—esophageal tubes (like the Combitube or esophageal obturator airway) are standalone supraglottic airway devices used as alternatives to endotracheal intubation, not in addition to it.
When Esophageal-Tracheal Tubes Are Appropriate
Primary Indication: Alternative to Endotracheal Intubation
For healthcare professionals trained in its use, the esophageal-tracheal tube (Combitube) is an acceptable alternative to endotracheal intubation (Class IIa, LOE A) during cardiac arrest when standard intubation is not feasible 1.
Specific Clinical Scenarios:
- Failed or difficult endotracheal intubation during CPR when performed by providers with limited intubation experience
- Limited access to the patient where positioning for direct laryngoscopy is impossible 1
- Potential unstable cervical spine injury where neck manipulation should be minimized 1
- Prehospital cardiac arrest where rapid airway control is needed by paramedics with variable intubation experience 1
Success Rates and Effectiveness:
The esophageal-tracheal tube provides successful ventilation during CPR in 62% to 100% of patients and delivers ventilation comparable to endotracheal intubation 1. Training costs are significantly lower ($80 vs $1,000 for ET training), and insertion is faster (mean 6 seconds vs 20 seconds) 2, 3.
Critical Contraindications and Limitations
Absolute Contraindications:
- Massive bronchorrhea or copious secretions—suction of the airways is not possible with this device 4
- Conscious or semi-conscious patients with intact gag reflex
- Known esophageal pathology (varices, strictures, recent surgery)
Major Pitfall—Fatal if Misidentified:
Fatal complications occur if the position of the distal lumen (esophagus vs trachea) is identified incorrectly 1. You must confirm tube placement immediately using:
- Clinical assessment (chest rise, breath sounds)
- End-tidal CO2 detection (mandatory)
- Esophageal detector device if available
Other Significant Limitations:
- No aspiration protection—neither Combitube nor LMA protect against aspiration in "full stomach" patients 4
- Cannot suction through the device—problematic in pulmonary edema or excessive secretions 4
- Esophageal trauma risk—lacerations, bruising, and subcutaneous emphysema reported 1
The Actual "Diversion" Procedure (Surgical Context)
If you're asking about surgical tracheoesophageal diversion, this is an entirely different concept—a permanent surgical procedure for intractable aspiration where the trachea is separated from the esophagus 5. This has no role in emergency airway management.
Similarly, esophageal diversion in trauma refers to surgical management of esophageal perforation (cervical esophagostomy for saliva diversion) 6, not airway management.
Practical Algorithm for Emergency Airway Management
- First-line: Attempt endotracheal intubation if experienced provider available
- If intubation fails or not feasible:
- Use esophageal-tracheal tube (Combitube) if trained
- Alternative: laryngeal tube or LMA
- Immediately confirm placement with end-tidal CO2
- If massive secretions present: Do NOT use Combitube—proceed to surgical airway or continue bag-mask until definitive airway possible
The esophageal-tracheal tube is a rescue device, not an adjunct to endotracheal intubation. You use one or the other, never both simultaneously.