Can naltrexone be used to treat skin-picking (excoriation) obsessive‑compulsive disorder?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 3, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Naltrexone for Skin-Picking Disorder

Naltrexone can be considered as a treatment option for skin-picking disorder (excoriation disorder), though it is not first-line therapy and evidence supporting its use is limited compared to SSRIs and N-acetylcysteine.

Treatment Hierarchy for Skin-Picking Disorder

The evidence-based approach prioritizes:

First-Line Treatments

  • SSRIs show the most promising results for reducing severity and frequency of skin-picking symptoms 1
  • N-acetylcysteine is well-established in treatment of skin-picking disorder 1
  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (specifically habit reversal or acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy) 2

Second-Line/Adjunctive Options

  • Naltrexone can be used when first-line treatments fail or as an adjunct 1, 2

Evidence for Naltrexone

The support for naltrexone in skin-picking disorder is modest but present:

  • A 2016 systematic review found insufficient evidence to support naltrexone use specifically for excoriation (skin-picking) disorder, though it showed benefit in related conditions like gambling disorder and kleptomania 3

  • However, more recent evidence is emerging: A 2024 case report demonstrated improvement with low-dose naltrexone (4.5 mg daily) in a patient with excoriation disorder, with symptom worsening when temporarily discontinued and improvement upon resumption 4

  • A 2025 review identified naltrexone among medications evaluated for skin-picking disorder, though noting that additional studies are needed to definitively establish its role 1

Practical Considerations

Dosing approaches:

  • Traditional dose: 50 mg daily 2
  • Low-dose option: 4.5 mg daily has shown benefit in at least one case 4
  • The FDA-approved dose for other conditions is 50 mg daily 5

When to consider naltrexone:

  • After inadequate response to SSRIs
  • When N-acetylcysteine has failed or is not tolerated
  • In patients with comorbid substance use issues (where naltrexone has established efficacy)
  • When there appears to be a strong reward/gratification component to the picking behavior

Important caveats:

  • Naltrexone is FDA-approved only for alcoholism and opioid dependence, not for skin-picking disorder 5
  • Must ensure patient is opioid-free before initiating (naloxone challenge test may be needed) 5
  • Monitor for hepatotoxicity, especially with doses above 50 mg 5
  • The mechanism in skin-picking likely involves modulation of the opioid reward system

Clinical Algorithm

  1. Start with SSRI (at higher doses than used for depression) combined with habit-reversal therapy
  2. Add or switch to N-acetylcysteine if inadequate response after 8-12 weeks
  3. Consider naltrexone (50 mg daily or trial of 4.5 mg daily) if:
    • Partial response to above treatments
    • Strong compulsive/reward-seeking component to behavior
    • Patient can comply with opioid-free requirement
  4. Consider antipsychotic augmentation (olanzapine, aripiprazole) as alternative to naltrexone 1

The evidence for naltrexone remains weaker than for SSRIs and N-acetylcysteine, but it represents a reasonable option in treatment-resistant cases or when integrated into a comprehensive treatment plan.

References

Research

Pharmacologic Management of Skin-Picking Disorder: An Updated Review.

Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 2025

Research

Skin picking disorder.

The American journal of psychiatry, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.