What is the incidence and prevalence of pubic ramus fractures in long-term care settings?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: June 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

The incidence and prevalence of pubic ramus fractures in long-term care settings is significant, with an estimated annual incidence of 3-5 per 100 residents, and a one-year mortality rate of 16.7% to 23% 1, 2. The true prevalence may be underestimated as many pubic ramus fractures present with vague symptoms and may go undiagnosed. Some key points to consider include:

  • Risk factors specific to long-term care residents include decreased mobility, muscle weakness, poor balance, cognitive impairment, and multiple comorbidities 3, 4.
  • Management typically involves pain control, limited weight-bearing as tolerated, and gradual mobilization, with most patients returning to their baseline functional status within 8-12 weeks 3, 4.
  • Prevention strategies should focus on fall prevention programs, osteoporosis screening and treatment, and environmental modifications to reduce fracture risk in this vulnerable population 1, 2.
  • Women are affected more frequently than men, with a ratio of approximately 3:1, largely due to higher rates of osteoporosis 3, 4.
  • The strongest predictor for 1-year mortality was complications during admission and a dependent ambulatory status 1. Some of the key statistics from recent studies include:
  • One-year mortality rate was 16.7% to 23% 1, 2
  • 34% of patients were institutionalized at discharge 1
  • 49% lost their independent mobility status and 40% of the patients did not experience a full recovery 1
  • The median EQ-5D-Index Value was 0.62, indicating a decreased quality of life 2
  • Average Parker Mobility Score was 4, indicating restricted mobility 2
  • 21.2% of patients experienced additional fragility fractures within a two-year period 2

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.