What do a liver profile and the NASH (non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis)/FibroSure (FibroTest) assess?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 8, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

What a Liver Profile and NASH/FibroSure Assess

A liver profile provides basic hepatic biochemistry (transaminases, bilirubin, albumin, platelets), while FibroSure (FibroTest) is a proprietary blood-based biomarker that specifically assesses the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and can help identify those with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Liver Profile Components and Purpose

A standard liver profile typically includes:

  • Transaminases (AST, ALT): Markers of hepatocyte injury
  • Alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin: Indicators of cholestasis
  • Albumin and prothrombin time: Measures of synthetic liver function
  • Platelet count: Can indicate portal hypertension and advanced fibrosis

These basic tests help identify liver injury but cannot accurately stage fibrosis or diagnose NASH on their own. They serve as the foundation for calculating simple non-invasive fibrosis scores like FIB-4 (using age, AST, ALT, and platelets) 1.

FibroSure (FibroTest) Specifics

FibroSure is the U.S. commercial name for FibroTest, a patented serum biomarker panel that assesses liver fibrosis severity 1.

What FibroSure Measures:

  • Primary target: Hepatic fibrosis stage (F0-F4)
  • Specific focus: Detection of advanced fibrosis (stages F3-F4, including bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis)
  • Prognostic value: Identifies patients at risk for liver-related complications including hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensation, and death 1

Performance Characteristics:

FibroSure demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD with an AUROC of approximately 0.84 2, 3. Using a cutoff of 0.48, it can effectively rule out advanced fibrosis 4. However, it does not outperform simpler calculations like FIB-4 in terms of diagnostic accuracy, though it remains a validated alternative 1.

NASH Assessment

Critical limitation: Neither standard liver profiles nor FibroSure can definitively diagnose NASH 1.

When combined with other biomarkers in the Fibromax panel, additional tests include:

  • NashTest: Attempts to identify NASH but has suboptimal accuracy (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 37.5%) 5
  • SteatoTest: Assesses degree of hepatic steatosis 6
  • ActiTest: Evaluates inflammatory activity 6

The evidence is clear that liver biopsy remains the reference standard for diagnosing NASH because available non-invasive tests lack acceptable accuracy for this specific diagnosis 4. FibroSure and related tests are better suited for fibrosis staging than NASH diagnosis.

Clinical Application Algorithm

For fibrosis risk stratification in NAFLD patients:

  1. First-line screening: Calculate FIB-4 score using routine liver profile

    • FIB-4 <1.3: Rules out advanced fibrosis (NPV >90%) 1
    • FIB-4 >1.3: Proceed to secondary testing
  2. Secondary assessment (when FIB-4 >1.3):

    • Use FibroSure/FibroTest (cutoff <0.48 rules out advanced fibrosis) 4
    • Or use elastography if available (more accurate but costlier) 1
  3. Indeterminate results: Consider liver biopsy for definitive staging

Key prognostic insight: Fibrosis stage, particularly advanced fibrosis (F3-F4), is the strongest predictor of liver-related mortality, hepatocellular carcinoma, and decompensation—making it more clinically relevant than NASH diagnosis alone 1.

Important Caveats

  • Age affects accuracy: FIB-4 and similar scores may overestimate fibrosis in patients >65 years; higher cutoffs (FIB-4 >2.0) should be considered 4
  • Obesity and diabetes: May reduce accuracy of some scores 4
  • Cost consideration: FibroSure is proprietary and more expensive than FIB-4, which is free and equally validated 1
  • Cannot replace biopsy for NASH diagnosis: If therapeutic decisions depend on confirming NASH histology, biopsy remains necessary 4

Bottom line: Use routine liver profile to calculate FIB-4 as your first step. Reserve FibroSure for secondary assessment when FIB-4 is elevated and elastography is unavailable. Neither test reliably diagnoses NASH—that requires biopsy 1, 4.

Related Questions

Is the FibroSure (FibroTest) blood test appropriate for diagnosing fatty liver disease and assessing liver fibrosis?
Is a FibroSure (FibroTest) test required to diagnose hepatic steatosis in a patient with non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)?
What is the appropriate management plan for a patient with severe non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and bridging fibrosis?
What are the differential diagnoses of cyanosis in a patient with non‑alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)‑related chronic liver disease?
What is the difference between liver stiffness measured by FibroScan and fibrosis assessed by histology?
What are the effects of carbidopa/levodopa (Sinemet) on the immune system in a patient with Parkinson's disease?
How can a syphilitic chancre be distinguished from other penile lesions in a patient presenting with a painful penile ulcer?
A female patient reports significant anxiety related to fear of negative evaluation, negative feedback filtering, catastrophizing, and rigid routines (visiting the same grocery store at the same time and taking the same route home). What type of anxiety disorder does this represent?
As the primary care physician for a 77‑year‑old woman with progressive fatigue, excessive daytime sleepiness, worsening cognition, mild hand weakness, a history of well‑controlled colitis and elevated cortisol, and who is taking tirzepatide, can you interpret her recent laboratory results (thyroid panel, vitamin B12, folate, complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel, vitamin D, and hemoglobin A1C) to identify potential contributors to her symptoms?
What do the MRI findings of suspected partial tears and tendinopathy of the posterior tibial and anterior tibial tendons, tenosynovitis of the peroneus longus and brevis tendons, minimal Achilles tendon involvement, and cystic or erosive changes in the midfoot and second metatarsal head indicate, and what is the recommended management?
In a patient receiving Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan), is B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) an unreliable marker for assessing heart‑failure severity?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.