What is the definition of interstitial lung abnormalities?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 9, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Definition of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are nondependent bilateral parenchymal abnormalities detected on chest CT, including ground-glass or reticular abnormalities, lung distortion, traction bronchiectasis, and/or honeycombing involving ≤5% of a lung zone by visual estimate, but without meeting criteria for interstitial lung disease. 1

Core Diagnostic Criteria

The 2025 American Thoracic Society clinical statement provides the most current and authoritative definition, building upon the Fleischner Society Position Paper with updated evidence:

Required CT Features (All Must Be Present):

  • Bilateral involvement (with rare exceptions in high-risk populations)
  • Nondependent location - abnormalities must persist on prone imaging if initially seen in dependent areas on supine scans
  • Limited extent - ≤5% of any single lung zone affected
  • Does not meet ILD criteria - this is the critical distinguishing feature

Specific Parenchymal Patterns Include:

  • Ground-glass opacities
  • Reticular abnormalities
  • Lung architectural distortion
  • Traction bronchiectasis
  • Honeycombing

The lung is divided into six zones (upper, middle, lower on each side) demarcated by the inferior aortic arch and right inferior pulmonary vein levels. 1

Three ILA Subtypes with Different Prognostic Implications

The classification system has direct clinical relevance for risk stratification:

1. Nonsubpleural ILA

  • Patchy ground-glass and peribronchovascular opacities
  • Minimal reticular changes
  • Often upper lung zone predominance
  • Lowest risk for progression 1

2. Subpleural Nonfibrotic ILA

  • Bilateral subpleural reticulations
  • No traction bronchiectasis or honeycombing
  • Intermediate risk profile 1

3. Subpleural Fibrotic ILA

  • Bilateral subpleural reticulations with traction bronchiectasis
  • May include honeycombing
  • Architectural distortion defines fibrosis
  • Highest risk for progression to ILD and poorest prognosis 1, 2

Critical Distinctions from ILD

ILAs become reclassified as ILD when any of the following occur:

Imaging Criteria:

  • Fibrotic abnormalities (honeycombing and/or reticulation with traction bronchiectasis) involving >5% of total lung volume (note: total volume, not per zone)
  • Progressive fibrotic abnormality on serial CT
  • Presence of major fibrotic ILD pattern (UIP/probable UIP, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, or fibrotic NSIP) 1

Clinical/Physiological Criteria:

  • Respiratory symptoms attributable to ILD
  • Abnormal pulmonary function testing
  • Pathology showing major fibrotic ILD pattern 1

The threshold shifts from ≤5% per lung zone (for ILA definition) to >5% total lung volume (for ILD definition) to capture more diffuse involvement and enhance specificity. 1

Important Caveats and Pitfalls

When Unilateral Findings May Still Be Relevant:

Despite the bilateral requirement, unilateral abnormalities warrant attention in:

  • Patients with strong family history of familial pulmonary fibrosis
  • Known ILD-associated genetic variants (e.g., MUC5B promoter variant)
  • Connective tissue disease
  • Occupational exposures

However, progression risk data for unilateral cases remains limited, and findings often represent non-ILA etiologies. 1

Features That Don't Count Toward the 5% Threshold:

  • Nonemphysematous cysts
  • Centrilobular nodularity
  • Features of pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis

These can be present but don't contribute to volume calculations. 1

Avoiding False Positives:

Confirm that abnormalities are truly nondependent - mild changes exclusively in dependent locations on supine imaging must persist on prone imaging to qualify as ILA. This prevents overcalling physiologic atelectasis as pathology. 1

Evolution of the Definition

The 2025 ATS statement deliberately removed two previous requirements:

  1. No longer requires findings to be "incidental" - ILAs can be identified in any clinical context
  2. No longer excludes high-risk populations - ILAs can occur in smokers, those with occupational exposures, etc., as these populations may still have non-progressive abnormalities from postinfectious or aspiration-related causes 1

This makes the definition more practical for radiologists who often lack complete clinical context and acknowledges that even high-risk individuals can have stable, non-progressive findings.

Clinical Significance

ILAs represent a spectrum from inconsequential radiological findings to early ILD. Prevalence ranges from 2.5-16.7% in screening populations, with higher rates in older individuals and smokers. 3 Progression to ILD occurs in 20-80% depending on subtype and risk factors. 4, 3 The subpleural fibrotic subtype carries the greatest likelihood of progression and is associated with increased mortality. 2, 5

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.