What are the reasons for recurrence after POEM (peroral endoscopic myotomy) performed by the provider?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 10, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Reasons for POEM Recurrence

Approximately 10-15% of patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms after POEM, with the primary causes being incomplete myotomy, blown-out myotomy (BOM), disease progression, and inadequate myotomy length—particularly in type III achalasia where the myotomy must extend to cover the entire spastic segment 1.

Key Mechanisms of Recurrence

Incomplete or Inadequate Myotomy

The most common technical reason for recurrence is an incomplete myotomy that fails to adequately disrupt the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) or extend sufficiently into the esophageal body 1. The optimal myotomy length remains undetermined, and inadequate extension—especially in type III achalasia where spastic segments require longer myotomies—directly correlates with treatment failure 1.

Blown-Out Myotomy (BOM)

BOM is an emerging and clinically significant cause of recurrence, occurring in approximately 1.9-30% of cases depending on the series 2, 3. This pseudodiverticulum develops at the myotomy site, characterized by:

  • Distal pseudodiverticulum with mouth diameter >2 cm
  • 50% expansion of esophageal diameter on barium esophagography

  • Median onset of 14 months post-POEM 2
  • 77.8% of BOM patients develop recurrent symptoms requiring additional treatment 2
  • Most commonly located on the right esophageal wall (97.8%) 2

BOM causes food retention and stasis at the myotomy site, leading to dysphagia and regurgitation despite technically adequate initial myotomy 4, 3.

Disease Progression

Achalasia is a chronic, progressive condition. Long-term surveillance reveals that some patients progress to end-stage achalasia with severe esophageal dilation, sigmoidization, or aperistalsis despite initially successful myotomy 1. This represents natural disease evolution rather than technical failure.

Periesophageal Scarring and Fibrosis

Patients with previous Heller myotomy who undergo salvage POEM demonstrate significantly worse outcomes (67% vs 80% symptom palliation at 5 years) due to fibrosis, narrow crural closure, and tight fundoplication limiting myotomy effectiveness 5. This scarring can also develop after initial POEM, though less commonly.

Reflux-Related Complications

While not a direct cause of dysphagia recurrence, post-POEM reflux esophagitis (occurring in 41-65% of patients) can lead to stricture formation, which mimics or causes true symptom recurrence 1. This is particularly problematic in patients not adherent to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Diagnostic Approach to Recurrence

When symptoms recur, comprehensive re-evaluation must include 1:

  • Repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (assess for BOM, stricture, esophagitis)
  • High-resolution manometry (evaluate residual LES pressure, identify incomplete myotomy)
  • Timed barium esophagram (visualize BOM, assess esophageal emptying, identify structural abnormalities)
  • Consider functional luminal impedance planimetry (FLIP) to assess esophagogastric junction distensibility

Management Implications

For recurrent symptoms after POEM, repeat POEM (re-POEM) demonstrates superior efficacy compared to pneumatic dilation (62% vs 27% success rate), though outcomes remain inferior to index POEM 1, 5.

Common pitfall: Assuming all post-POEM dysphagia represents reflux. Many patients have structural causes (BOM, incomplete myotomy) requiring endoscopic or surgical intervention rather than acid suppression alone 1, 6.

Critical consideration: The absence of clear procedural risk factors for BOM in large cohorts suggests that even technically excellent procedures can develop this complication, emphasizing the need for long-term surveillance 2, 3.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.