Mechanisms of Colistin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii
The primary mechanism of colistin resistance in A. baumannii involves modification of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)/lipid A through upregulation of the PmrAB two-component system, which adds phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) moieties to lipid A, reducing colistin binding. 1, 2, 3
Primary Resistance Mechanisms
1. LPS/Lipid A Modification (Most Common)
The PmrAB two-component regulatory system represents the dominant resistance pathway:
- PmrB mutations drive overexpression of PmrA, PmrB, and PmrC proteins (increases of 2.9-5.5 fold) 4
- PmrC (also called EptA) catalyzes addition of PEtN to lipid A phosphate groups 2, 5
- This modification reduces the negative charge of the outer membrane, decreasing colistin electrostatic binding 1
- Mutations in pmrA and pmrB genes are the primary mechanism in clinical isolates 5, 3
- Hyperexpression of the cryptic eptA gene through spontaneous insertion mutations upstream or through disruption of the hns gene (histone-like protein) leads to clinically significant resistance 6
2. Complete LPS Loss
- Mutations in LPS biosynthetic genes (lpxA, lpxC, lpxD, lpsO) result in complete loss of LPS 1, 2, 5
- While this eliminates colistin's target, these mutants have severe fitness costs and cannot effectively colonize the lung 6
- Less clinically relevant than modification mechanisms due to reduced pathogenicity 6
3. Heteroresistance
Heteroresistance represents an early, critical stage in developing stable colistin resistance 7:
- Defined as resistant subpopulations (18.7-100% prevalence) emerging from otherwise susceptible strains (MIC ≤2 mg/L) 7
- Previous colistin use is a major risk factor 7
- Standard microdilution methods cannot detect heteroresistance—look for colonies within disc/E-test inhibition zones 7
- Heteroresistant strains progress to stable resistance through stepwise acquisition of additional mutations, particularly eptA insertions 6
4. Secondary Mechanisms
- Efflux pump upregulation: Enhanced expression of adeIJK, adeC, emrB, mexB, and macAB systems 4, 5
- Outer membrane remodeling: Alterations in phospholipid composition, particularly reduced glycerophospholipids and fatty acids 4
- Metabolic reprogramming: Changes in purine, glycerophospholipid, starch/sucrose, and glutathione metabolism 4
- Porin alterations: Modified outer membrane permeability 2
Clinical Implications
Critical Warnings from Guidelines
The 2015 ICU Task Force guidelines 7 emphasize:
- Inappropriate colistin use creates substantial potential for rapid resistance development and therapeutic failure
- Detection of heteroresistance provides "strong warning" about resistance risk
- Clinical impact of heteroresistance remains incompletely understood, but evidence suggests it predicts treatment failure
Fitness Costs and Stability
- PmrB mutants retain pathogenic fitness and can colonize hosts even without colistin pressure 6
- Resistant variants show stability in the absence of drug initially 6
- However, prolonged passaging without colistin selects for pseudorevertants with disrupted LPS modification enzymes, causing re-sensitization 6
- This creates a dynamic equilibrium between resistance and fitness
Key Molecular Markers
When investigating colistin resistance, prioritize detection of:
- pmrA/pmrB mutations (most common clinical mechanism) 5, 3, 8
- pmrC/eptA overexpression 4, 3, 9
- lpxA, lpxC, lpxD gene disruptions 5, 3
- Insertion mutations upstream of eptA or in hns 6
Common Pitfalls
- Don't rely on standard susceptibility testing alone—it misses heteroresistance 7
- Don't assume LPS-deficient mutants are clinically significant—they have poor colonization capacity 6
- Don't overlook prior colistin exposure—it's a major risk factor for heteroresistance 7
- Recognize that resistance is multifactorial—multiple mechanisms often coexist in the same isolate 4, 2
The resistance landscape involves coordinated changes across LPS modification, membrane composition, efflux systems, and metabolism, creating a robust defense against colistin that can emerge rapidly under selection pressure 4, 2.