What are the eligibility criteria and treatment regimen for the VISION trial evaluating lutetium‑177‑PSMA‑617 in men with metastatic castration‑resistant prostate cancer?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

VISION Trial Eligibility and Treatment Regimen in mCRPC

The VISION trial enrolled 831 men with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had previously received at least one androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and one or two taxane-based chemotherapy regimens, randomizing them 2:1 to receive lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for 4-6 cycles) plus standard of care versus standard of care alone. 1, 2

Key Eligibility Criteria

Prior Treatment Requirements

  • At least one prior ARPI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) 3
  • One or two prior taxane-based chemotherapy regimens (typically docetaxel) 1, 4
  • Castrate testosterone levels maintained (medical or surgical castration) 2

PSMA PET/CT Imaging Requirements

The imaging criteria were highly specific and represent a critical selection factor:

  • At least one PSMA-positive lesion with Ga-68 PSMA-11 uptake greater than normal liver 3
  • No PSMA-negative dominant lesions meeting size criteria 1

PSMA-negative lesions were defined as:

  • Bone lesions with soft tissue component ≥1.0 cm
  • Lymph nodes ≥2.5 cm in short axis
  • Solid organ metastases ≥1.0 cm
  • All lacking PSMA uptake (uptake ≤ normal liver) 3

Critical pitfall: Patients were excluded if any single lesion larger than these size thresholds had uptake less than or equal to normal liver, even if other lesions were PSMA-positive 2

Performance Status and Baseline Characteristics

  • ECOG performance status 0-2 2
  • Progressive disease documented (PSA, radiographic, or symptomatic progression) 5

Stratification Factors

Randomization was stratified by:

  • Baseline lactate dehydrogenase (≤260 vs >260 IU/L)
  • Presence of liver metastases
  • ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2)
  • Concurrent ARPI use as part of standard of care 2, 4

Treatment Regimen

Lu-177-PSMA-617 Dosing

7.4 GBq (200 mCi) intravenously every 6 weeks 3, 1, 3, 1, 3

Number of Cycles

  • Initial plan: 4 cycles
  • Optional extension: up to 6 total cycles for patients with stable disease or partial response after 4 doses, per investigator discretion 2, 4

Important safety note: Analysis of cycles 5-6 showed no additional safety concerns compared to cycles 1-4, supporting the use of extended treatment in responding patients 6

Concurrent Standard of Care

Protocol-permitted standard of care included:

  • ARPIs (abiraterone, enzalutamide)
  • Bisphosphonates
  • Denosumab
  • Radiation therapy to localized targets
  • Glucocorticoids 3, 1

Explicitly excluded from standard of care:

  • Chemotherapy
  • Immunotherapy
  • Radium-223
  • Investigational drugs 4

Clinical Outcomes from VISION

Efficacy Results

Overall survival: 15.3 vs 11.3 months (HR 0.62,95% CI 0.52-0.74, P<0.001) 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 2

Radiographic progression-free survival: 8.7 vs 3.4 months (HR 0.40,99.2% CI 0.29-0.57, P<0.001) 3, 1, 3, 1, 3

Objective response rate (in measurable disease): 49% vs 1.6% 2

Safety Profile

Grade ≥3 adverse events: 52.7% vs 38% 1, 5

Most common grade ≥3 events:

  • Anemia (15%)
  • Thrombocytopenia (9%)
  • Lymphopenia (51%)
  • Fatigue 3, 1

Critical safety consideration: Despite higher toxicity rates, quality of life was maintained and time to symptomatic skeletal events was delayed (11.5 vs 6.8 months, HR 0.50) 7

Current Guideline Recommendations

NCCN Category 1 recommendation for patients with ≥1 PSMA-positive lesion, predominantly PSMA-positive disease, no dominant PSMA-negative lesions, who have received prior ARPI and taxane chemotherapy 3

FDA approval (March 2022) for PSMA-positive mCRPC after ARPI and taxane therapy 1, 8

Expanded FDA indication (based on PSMAfore): Also approved for patients progressing after ARPI who are appropriate candidates for delaying taxane chemotherapy 1

Imaging Agent Flexibility

While VISION used Ga-68 PSMA-11, guidelines recognize equivalency of:

  • Ga-68 PSMA-11
  • F-18 piflufolastat PSMA
  • F-18 flotufolastat PSMA 3, 9

All three tracers are acceptable for determining treatment eligibility 1, 9

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.