Is PD-L1 testing required for all patients with relapsed non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 18, 2026 • View editorial policy

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

PD-L1 Testing in Relapsed NSCLC: Not Strictly Required, But Highly Recommended

PD-L1 testing is not absolutely required for all patients with relapsed NSCLC, but it is strongly recommended because it provides valuable information for treatment selection and can guide optimal immunotherapy choices. 1

The Nuanced Reality of PD-L1 Testing Requirements

The answer depends critically on which immunotherapy agent you're considering:

Companion vs. Complementary Diagnostics

  • Pembrolizumab requires PD-L1 testing (TPS ≥1%) as a companion diagnostic for second-line use after platinum-based chemotherapy progression 1
  • Nivolumab and atezolizumab do NOT require PD-L1 testing - these are approved with complementary diagnostics, meaning testing may aid in patient selection but is not mandatory 1

Clinical Practice Recommendations

The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Task Force unanimously agreed that all newly diagnosed patients should receive PD-L1 testing 1. For relapsed disease specifically:

  • Patients with squamous or non-squamous NSCLC who progressed on platinum-containing chemotherapy and have not previously received a checkpoint inhibitor should be considered for atezolizumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab 1
  • PD-L1 testing is routinely recommended at diagnosis to inform immunotherapy use in both first-line and second-line settings 2

Why Test Even When Not Required?

PD-L1 expression correlates with improved outcomes across multiple checkpoint inhibitors 1:

  • Higher PD-L1 expression (≥1%, ≥5%, ≥10%) associates with longer OS and PFS with nivolumab compared to chemotherapy 1
  • Even PD-L1-negative patients can benefit from nivolumab and atezolizumab, which is why testing isn't mandatory for these agents 1
  • 71% of the expert Task Force felt PD-L1 expression was predictive of checkpoint inhibitor response 1

Practical Algorithm for Relapsed NSCLC

  1. If pembrolizumab is being considered: PD-L1 testing is mandatory (companion diagnostic requirement) 1

  2. If nivolumab or atezolizumab is being considered: Testing is optional but recommended to:

    • Identify patients most likely to benefit
    • Inform discussions about expected response rates
    • Guide treatment sequencing decisions
  3. Testing should ideally use archived tissue from initial diagnosis if available, though the guidelines acknowledge PD-L1 expression can be dynamic 1

Important Caveats

  • PD-L1 is neither fully sensitive nor specific as a biomarker - some PD-L1-negative patients respond to immunotherapy, and some PD-L1-positive patients do not 1
  • Different assays exist (22C3, 28-8, SP142, SP263) with varying cutoffs and scoring systems 1
  • Smoking history (29% of experts) was also considered predictive of checkpoint inhibitor response 1

Bottom line: While you can legally prescribe nivolumab or atezolizumab without PD-L1 testing in relapsed NSCLC, best practice is to test all patients to optimize treatment selection and set appropriate expectations for response.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.